Too bad, hope Adobe dies forever soon. All of their stuff has become bloated and horrible (Flash the worst among them), and unless there is a serious internal restructuring, I have little hope that decency will return.
The nice thing about desktop software is that it doesn't vanish with its authors. If Adobe crumbles or restructures, Photoshop et al will be there just the same as they were, and people can continue to use them. Meanwhile, if people thought they could get a serious hold where Photoshop once stood (because Photoshop became unmaintained, which I doubt would happen, even if Adobe dies; Photoshop is a huge asset and I'm sure the ashes of Adobe could get a pretty good price based on that alone), the gap would be filled relatively quickly.
Where does it make all this money on? The article just mentions that they make Photoshop, Acrobat and Flash..and the Adobe press release doesn't provide any additional information.
Damn, none of the big stuff (the creative products) seem like particularly easy markets to compete. Acrobat might represent the best opportunity, but that thing is ingrained.
I look at this list and I am thrilled that I don't have to use a single one of these. I'm not even friends with anyone that does, except a couple of photographers.
I'd love to know how much of the 46.1 million of the "PDF & Flash Platform Revenue" and the 274.1 million of the "Acrobat, LiveCycle, ColdFusion, Flex" is purely PDF related. How many people are buying Adobe Acrobat just to edit PDFs, documents that should be source code but aren't?
I just hate it when digital things become analog (or virtually analog, like PDF) and I doubly hate it that tools get built for editing the now analog digital document. Like OCR for Faxes, UGH!
Not a very informative article. They left out tons of information, such as that the growth is coming from their business products like LiveCycle (the article doesn't even recognize that side of their business). Also Adobe is spinning the Creative Suite story as "sales for the latest release are higher than they were at this point in time for the previous release" but my understanding from the sketchy articles out there, is that, overall, Creative Suite revenues are down a bit.
CS4 was widely panned and coupled with the poor economy, many companies skipped it. Adobe took a loss this quarter last year. The article doesn't state it but many CS3 owners have upgraded to CS5 because of the improving economy, some new features and not wanting to be too far behind software revisions.
26 comments
[ 15.0 ms ] story [ 894 ms ] threadAh, those were the times.
We'll all be better off when they do.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=adobe...
According to that, hardware acceleration seems to work well in the current beta.
Acrobat, LiveCycle, ColdFusion, Flex: 274.1 mill
Omniture: 98.4 mill
PostScript, FrameMaker, PageMaker, Macromedia Contribute, Macromedia Captivate, Macromedia FreeHand: 47.3 mill
PDF & Flash Platform Revenue: 46.1 mill
I'd love to know how much of the 46.1 million of the "PDF & Flash Platform Revenue" and the 274.1 million of the "Acrobat, LiveCycle, ColdFusion, Flex" is purely PDF related. How many people are buying Adobe Acrobat just to edit PDFs, documents that should be source code but aren't?
I just hate it when digital things become analog (or virtually analog, like PDF) and I doubly hate it that tools get built for editing the now analog digital document. Like OCR for Faxes, UGH!