According to the articles Venezuela killed around 10 times as many people.
However your comment is very off topic, and would derail conversation about the article at hand. You shouldn't do that, especially since your only goal seemed to be a pot shot at the White Hours.
This is Hacker News, despite the misleading name, the establishment (in a general sense) is very much in vogue. Personally, I take The New York Times with a grain of salt given the number of times they've been shown to be parroting talking points and information fed to them rather than engaging in journalism.
> Venezuelan special forces have carried out thousands of extrajudicial killings in the past 18 months and then manipulated crime scenes to make it look as if the victims had been resisting arrest.
> What do we make of a syndrome that seems to occur almost unerringly when a police officer is choking, hog-tying, or stunning with a Taser someone with a mental illness or drug addiction? And why do many experts dispute that the diagnosis even exists? While excited delirium is used to explain a significant number of deaths occurring in police custody, the term has not been recognized as a genuine mental health condition by the American Medical Association, the American Psychological Association, or the World Health Organization.
Despite that:
> Medical examiners and police departments say it’s a genuine syndrome. The National Association of Medical Examiners has recognized the condition for more than two decades. And in 2008, the Council of the American College of Emergency Physicians declared that excited delirium is “a real syndrome of uncertain etiology.”
8 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 25.7 ms ] thread[1] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jul/08/rodrigo-dutert...
However your comment is very off topic, and would derail conversation about the article at hand. You shouldn't do that, especially since your only goal seemed to be a pot shot at the White Hours.
Ah, so they died of excited delirium. ( https://leb.fbi.gov/articles/featured-articles/excited-delir... https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2015/06/excited-delirium... )
Crazy interpretation:
> What do we make of a syndrome that seems to occur almost unerringly when a police officer is choking, hog-tying, or stunning with a Taser someone with a mental illness or drug addiction? And why do many experts dispute that the diagnosis even exists? While excited delirium is used to explain a significant number of deaths occurring in police custody, the term has not been recognized as a genuine mental health condition by the American Medical Association, the American Psychological Association, or the World Health Organization.
Despite that:
> Medical examiners and police departments say it’s a genuine syndrome. The National Association of Medical Examiners has recognized the condition for more than two decades. And in 2008, the Council of the American College of Emergency Physicians declared that excited delirium is “a real syndrome of uncertain etiology.”
Poe's Law is strong with this one.