[–] inamberclad 7y ago ↗ What, exactly, is the new record? [–] Arbalest 7y ago ↗ Record low perhaps? Yeah it isn't clear here. [–] londons_explore 7y ago ↗ The data doesn't even show a record low. The latest data point is markedly above se of the ones before it.Besides, presumably Alaskan oil production was once zero - just this record doesn't go far enough back.
[–] Arbalest 7y ago ↗ Record low perhaps? Yeah it isn't clear here. [–] londons_explore 7y ago ↗ The data doesn't even show a record low. The latest data point is markedly above se of the ones before it.Besides, presumably Alaskan oil production was once zero - just this record doesn't go far enough back.
[–] londons_explore 7y ago ↗ The data doesn't even show a record low. The latest data point is markedly above se of the ones before it.Besides, presumably Alaskan oil production was once zero - just this record doesn't go far enough back.
[–] toomuchtodo 7y ago ↗ @mods: Propose updated title "Alaska Field Production of Crude Oil Sets New Record Low" [–] Fjolsvith 7y ago ↗ That would also be editorializing. [–] toomuchtodo 7y ago ↗ "Alaska Field Production of Crude Oil" would be a less helpful title, and it seems...redundant to write a blog post solely to make the observation follow convention.
[–] Fjolsvith 7y ago ↗ That would also be editorializing. [–] toomuchtodo 7y ago ↗ "Alaska Field Production of Crude Oil" would be a less helpful title, and it seems...redundant to write a blog post solely to make the observation follow convention.
[–] toomuchtodo 7y ago ↗ "Alaska Field Production of Crude Oil" would be a less helpful title, and it seems...redundant to write a blog post solely to make the observation follow convention.
6 comments
[ 3.7 ms ] story [ 32.0 ms ] threadBesides, presumably Alaskan oil production was once zero - just this record doesn't go far enough back.