So the difference is that they are renaming secret to private to reflect that they will be scanning the content of groups to review for content?
“the company has built a new tool called Group Quality, which scans all groups for content that breaks the platform's community standards — regardless of privacy settings”
This seems like a misleading headline: as far as I understand it you can still have the same effect: they've just made it an additional property of private groups instead of a whole separate category.
It is obviously clickbait albeit the title being technically correct. I would not have clicked it if the title mentioned the access level was being renamed.
I tried FB in early ~2000's because I had a @stanford email, but after a coworker's wife started tagging people and editorializing randomly, it was clearly more of a liability than value. I had emptied details and most content but kept for some old photos, but finally migrated and purged it this year because it's basically a vehicle of surprise privacy monetization to make Wall St. happy. If a social media service instead were instead subscriber- and donation-supported, it wouldn't develop such perverse incentives to sell-out its users to stay afloat.
Facebook's accumulation of a pattern of making major, surprise changes that are mostly about benefiting money-making, directly or indirectly. Super popular but seemingly more and more terrible as time goes on.
It's literally the same thing, just one setting for Public/Private, and a second for Visible/Not. Title is super clickbaity, they're not getting rid of anything.
I thought buzzfeednews was supposed to be better than classic buzzfeed, but I see they're really not.
Misleading, but it's BuzzFeed, so what do you expect.
Facebook is essentially changing Groups so instead of 3 categories with inherent discoverability rules (Public (find via search), Private (find via search), Secret (can not find via search)), they're separating the concerns of "Can non-members view posts?" and "Can non-members find this group via search?"
If I read correctly, then a correct headline would be "Facebook is adding non-discoverable Public groups", renaming Secret/Closed groups,and getting rid of nothing.
15 comments
[ 4.3 ms ] story [ 44.9 ms ] thread“the company has built a new tool called Group Quality, which scans all groups for content that breaks the platform's community standards — regardless of privacy settings”
Not sure why Group Quality was included in this PR.
I thought buzzfeednews was supposed to be better than classic buzzfeed, but I see they're really not.
Facebook is essentially changing Groups so instead of 3 categories with inherent discoverability rules (Public (find via search), Private (find via search), Secret (can not find via search)), they're separating the concerns of "Can non-members view posts?" and "Can non-members find this group via search?"
So this is actually now more flexible!
They are renaming them with the same functionality, broken into two toggles.