[–] toomim 6y ago ↗ This article says it's making a "DLT". But it doesn't define what a "DLT" is.Great. [–] tyingq 6y ago ↗ Distributed Ledger Technology. Maybe a new way of saying "block chain" without the current negative connotation? [–] ddrdrck_ 6y ago ↗ A DLT does not have to be a blockchain. It could use a directed acyclic graph for example (e.g. iota) [–] georgyo 6y ago ↗ In this case, there is a proof of stake utility token, buried deep in their docs, so it is a block chain.None is their examples mention the token, which is a bit odd.
[–] tyingq 6y ago ↗ Distributed Ledger Technology. Maybe a new way of saying "block chain" without the current negative connotation? [–] ddrdrck_ 6y ago ↗ A DLT does not have to be a blockchain. It could use a directed acyclic graph for example (e.g. iota) [–] georgyo 6y ago ↗ In this case, there is a proof of stake utility token, buried deep in their docs, so it is a block chain.None is their examples mention the token, which is a bit odd.
[–] ddrdrck_ 6y ago ↗ A DLT does not have to be a blockchain. It could use a directed acyclic graph for example (e.g. iota) [–] georgyo 6y ago ↗ In this case, there is a proof of stake utility token, buried deep in their docs, so it is a block chain.None is their examples mention the token, which is a bit odd.
[–] georgyo 6y ago ↗ In this case, there is a proof of stake utility token, buried deep in their docs, so it is a block chain.None is their examples mention the token, which is a bit odd.
4 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 19.8 ms ] threadGreat.
None is their examples mention the token, which is a bit odd.