[–] chrone 6y ago ↗ Great article!Looking forward for the 1 billion object article as we had lots of problems with 2 billion objects inside a single bucket in Ceph Luminous. [–] 0xF2 6y ago ↗ Yes, two billion in a single bucket is a bit much, index sharding only goes to ~700M if I remember correctly.
[–] 0xF2 6y ago ↗ Yes, two billion in a single bucket is a bit much, index sharding only goes to ~700M if I remember correctly.
[–] BlackLotus89 6y ago ↗ > Least but not last, we are introducing an extended lifecycle option, bringing Ceph support options to a full five years.I hope this doesn't mean that Red Hat will wait 2 years more than normal to offer support for nautilus.But I'm looking forward to "Beast mode". Seems like it's time to upgrade our ceph-ansible scripts... [–] 0xF2 6y ago ↗ We support multiple versions in parallel. Currently Jewel (which has just received the 5-year extension) and Luminous, with Nautilus set for release later this year.Beast is pretty cool. Full performance analysis coming in September!
[–] 0xF2 6y ago ↗ We support multiple versions in parallel. Currently Jewel (which has just received the 5-year extension) and Luminous, with Nautilus set for release later this year.Beast is pretty cool. Full performance analysis coming in September!
4 comments
[ 1.9 ms ] story [ 21.2 ms ] threadLooking forward for the 1 billion object article as we had lots of problems with 2 billion objects inside a single bucket in Ceph Luminous.
I hope this doesn't mean that Red Hat will wait 2 years more than normal to offer support for nautilus.
But I'm looking forward to "Beast mode". Seems like it's time to upgrade our ceph-ansible scripts...
Beast is pretty cool. Full performance analysis coming in September!