5 comments

[ 2.4 ms ] story [ 22.2 ms ] thread
This article should have read backwards starting with

"The Briefing Kit had been a premature release of the summary results, before the full research outcomes had gone through the usual thorough review and editing process."

EG - no peer reviewed study exists, this link itself is based on a non-peer edited summary of the actual study.

Gah! Why is this relevant to hacker news? You can take this to reddit and have a willing audience.