There are several good arguments in the article that cosmology features several philosophical decisions. There are no arguments whatsoever that those decisions would in any way benefit from interference by or consultation with the morass of arbitrary statements which compose formal philosophy. The author doesn't even try to lay out a hypothetical scenario in which a scientist would benefit from... well I don't know exactly what they propose since they don't actually make any suggestions at all besides "use more philosophy".
1 comment
[ 42.5 ms ] story [ 114 ms ] thread