There's nothing inherently wrong with wanting a language to ape a solid aspect of another nature. For all you know (chain) OP _wants_ to write Nim but needs memory safety.
The more I view things, the more I feel marriage probably is the best metaphor for any nontrivial undertaking that is worth a lifelong investment, for a group of people.
Think about it, marriage requires:
* Love
* Dedication
* Persistence
* Endurance
* Mutual respect
Pretty much the same thing for any highly functioning team!
14 comments
[ 2.3 ms ] story [ 45.1 ms ] threadThe tuple declaration is declaring one identifier with multiple fields. The names of the field are only legal as, well, fields of the outer object.
https://nim-lang.org/araq/ownedrefs.html
If you want to run without GC, the new runtime is has an ownership model.
Think about it, marriage requires:
* Love
* Dedication
* Persistence
* Endurance
* Mutual respect
Pretty much the same thing for any highly functioning team!