[–] bediger4000 6y ago ↗ Slightly off topic, but...Once upon a time in usenet, there was a fellow named Koos Nolst Trenite: https://www.scientology-lies.com/event/1995-02-01/koos-nolst...Koos transcended the bounds of reality by claiming to do Scientology "audits" clairvoyantly on L. Ron Hubbard, who was of course, dead by this time.Is Koos any relation to Gerard? I could not google up an answer. I did find a "Gerardina Elise Nolst Trenite" (https://www.werelate.org/wiki/Person:Gerardina_Nolst_Trenit%...) not clear if she is related or not. [–] jabbernotty 6y ago ↗ There was a time when Koos Nolst Trenité and I walked the same street. For reasons I can't recall we struck up a conversation a few times. Nice guy.I dug up his card to find his site; he seems to still be active there. http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld/
[–] jabbernotty 6y ago ↗ There was a time when Koos Nolst Trenité and I walked the same street. For reasons I can't recall we struck up a conversation a few times. Nice guy.I dug up his card to find his site; he seems to still be active there. http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld/
[–] chasil 6y ago ↗ Ok, let's compare.To be: I am. You are. [S]he is. They/we are.Etre: Je vais. Tu es. Il/Elle est. Nous sommes. Vous etes. Ils sont.Ser: Yo soy. Tu eres. El[la] es. Nosotros somos.Estar: Yo somos. Tu estas. El[la] esta. Nosotros estamos. Ellos estan.I think that pretty well sums it up. [–] tgirod 6y ago ↗ s/vais/suis/I think the point you are making is grammatical: in pretty much any language, the most common verbs are irregular.But isn't this poem more about orthography and pronunciation? Some languages are much more regular than english in that regard. [–] yorwba 6y ago ↗ > in pretty much any language, the most common verbs are irregular.It's the other way around: if a language retains some irregular forms, then only because they're common enough that native speakers can remember them. [–] vo2maxer 6y ago ↗ Suggestion: Instead of “Yo somos,” it should be, Yo estoy.
[–] tgirod 6y ago ↗ s/vais/suis/I think the point you are making is grammatical: in pretty much any language, the most common verbs are irregular.But isn't this poem more about orthography and pronunciation? Some languages are much more regular than english in that regard. [–] yorwba 6y ago ↗ > in pretty much any language, the most common verbs are irregular.It's the other way around: if a language retains some irregular forms, then only because they're common enough that native speakers can remember them.
[–] yorwba 6y ago ↗ > in pretty much any language, the most common verbs are irregular.It's the other way around: if a language retains some irregular forms, then only because they're common enough that native speakers can remember them.
[–] teddyh 6y ago ↗ Further notes on The Chaos:http://www-users.cs.york.ac.uk/~susan/cyc/e/pronounc.htm
7 comments
[ 3.6 ms ] story [ 33.4 ms ] threadOnce upon a time in usenet, there was a fellow named Koos Nolst Trenite: https://www.scientology-lies.com/event/1995-02-01/koos-nolst...
Koos transcended the bounds of reality by claiming to do Scientology "audits" clairvoyantly on L. Ron Hubbard, who was of course, dead by this time.
Is Koos any relation to Gerard? I could not google up an answer. I did find a "Gerardina Elise Nolst Trenite" (https://www.werelate.org/wiki/Person:Gerardina_Nolst_Trenit%...) not clear if she is related or not.
I dug up his card to find his site; he seems to still be active there. http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld/
To be: I am. You are. [S]he is. They/we are.
Etre: Je vais. Tu es. Il/Elle est. Nous sommes. Vous etes. Ils sont.
Ser: Yo soy. Tu eres. El[la] es. Nosotros somos.
Estar: Yo somos. Tu estas. El[la] esta. Nosotros estamos. Ellos estan.
I think that pretty well sums it up.
I think the point you are making is grammatical: in pretty much any language, the most common verbs are irregular.
But isn't this poem more about orthography and pronunciation? Some languages are much more regular than english in that regard.
It's the other way around: if a language retains some irregular forms, then only because they're common enough that native speakers can remember them.
http://www-users.cs.york.ac.uk/~susan/cyc/e/pronounc.htm