Ask HN: Interviewing at a Startup - Should I Lie About My Salary?

9 points by jamtime ↗ HN
First off, I just want to say that I would never advocate lying in an interview ever however I have heard from multiple sources that inflating your salary anywhere from 5-10% has now become the norm, as most companies will not investigate a potential employee's previous salary as long as it is within a reasonable range. I'd love to hear what the community has to say on this. How great is the risk here and if you could be potentially making an additional (say) $10,000+ a year isn't taking the risk justified?

18 comments

[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 66.3 ms ] thread
Is risk of discovery really the only thing you're concerned about?

Lying to your employer about anything seems like a compromise of ethics that isn't be justified by you getting more money.

The biggest risk is that someone would lie to me during an interview, I would hire them on good faith, and would later find out that they have questionable ethics. Please don't lie in interviews, it's hard enough to find good people as it is.
Your not wanting to get ripped off (hiring a questionable employee) perfectly demonstrates the problem posed in the original question.

Salary negotiation is inherently adversarial. It will remain that way until employers start offering potential hires more money than they are asking for.

If someone tells you they want 80k, you aren't going to come back and tell them that you've budgeted up to 100k. You're going to tell them maybe you can swing 70k (another lie, like what the employee may be doing to you).

Just as you don't want to hire someone that will lie about previous salary to get more, I don't want to work for a boss that will lie to keep more money in the company coffer.

Why lie, just tell then what you want. If for example you're making 50k, and you want 70k ask for 80k. Usually they will tell you yes or no, negotiate, and tell you what they can afford.
Many potential employers will directly ask how much you were/are making. While presumably there's nothing wrong with just saying "I'd rather not say" and trying to discuss what you want to be making, I don't think a lot of people feel comfortable not answering a question directly.

I completely agree with you though, both sides should be as transparent as possible during the negotiation.

I tend to agree. By revealing your previous salary you lose any negotiating leverage you had.
Don't lie about what you earn now, state what you are expecting if you're hired.

I've neve been asked the question about my current salary (expect for that one phone call from a recruiter in the UK).

I definitely wouldn't, certainly not in the UK. If you're caught out, it's grounds for dismissal. And the vast majority of employers will seek your P45 and pay slips from your current job. However, it is perfectly reasonable to expect an uptick on moving: this is to compensate you for the risk and overheads of moving. Most employers will expect to have to pay you more.
Don't lie but don't tell either. Tell them that in a negotiation anyone who gives a number first gets a worse deal, hence you won't tell. After all, they are a startup and should appreciate some street smartness.
Who says your new employer has to pay you your old salary? Don't lie, just ask for the salary you want.

If you're worried about the "what was your old salary" question, see: http://bit.ly/fy9zDt

uh-uh. so you assume the company just wants to be fair? As previously described, its a business negotiation. Your only as good as your last salary.
I know a lot of people on here are going to take the high road and say don't lie, etc. But lets talk about reality and the reality is this is a negotiation, no different than negotiating the purchase of a car from a car salesman. You do not have perfect information. One of the areas that you lack information is will this interviewer use the knowledge of my former salary against me. Not only is it not uncommon but it is pretty usual. I would say (back when I used to work for other people) 7 out of 10 times I would be put in a situation where the interviewer was trying to leverage me down based on knowledge of my former salary. I used to feel that this was unethical for them to do until I understood that you are in a negotiation and for many the standard rule of ethnics does not apply. You are simply trying to get the best deal you can out of the situation using as many variables as you can. So given the situation you have one of 2 choices lie to offset the possibility that this interviewer will use the information to leverage you down, this way you are starting form a false ceiling. Or secondly refuse to divulge that info with an explanation that you feel it would be used against you, that you have an aversion to lying and don't want to be forced into a situation to lie to defend your ground in negotiating. Many interviewer do not get that form of response and some may be impressed by your principals you could very well frame the situation out of a negotiation by doing so, you also run the risk of aggravating the interviewer if they press for the info and you stand firm.

So ethically what do you do, well I always like to frame the situation as a car sale, if a car salesman asked well how much do you have to spend on the car. What is your answer is it naturally less that the sticker on the car. You see the sticker price is very much like your previous salary, but the car lot has chosen to inflate it to give themselves wiggle room. Ethically few have a problem with this even though almost every line item on the factory invoice is a lie. It is common knowledge that they are inflated. Further if asked how much you have to spend on the car most answer somewhere below the sticker, trying to move that number down and reduce some of those inflated items to somewhere closer to reality. Finally the salesman hold the knowledge as to the true value of the car but would never offer it over as a tool in negotiating. This would be akin to you original non-inflated former salary.

Looking at that hypothetical situation, flipping the parties and reversing the roles you can see the ethics involved. Every modern corporation works this way and one would be well served to remember that in the end they are dealing with corporations. We as a society have a double standard in which corporations are permitted to have dubious ethics as standard operating procedure while the individual is lambasted for items as small as inflating ones salary so they don't get cut to the bone in salary negotiation.

For me personally, I see no issue with inflating a former salary, but that is because I am a skilled negotiator, I don't take it personal and I expect disinformation. In a weird way I am impressed when someone bests me at the negotiating table and most of all, I understand that the person at the negotiating table is fighting for their scraps what they do at the negotiation table has little reflection on what their true character is. If I found out that an employee lied to me about a former salary, I would not terminate them, because I understand that culturally corporations use this information all the time to leverage them down. They are paranoid about it and rightfully so.

As for them finding out, I don't know where you are at in the world, but in the US their is no way for them to find out unless you provide them with that information. They cannot ask for that info from a former employer and no employer would open themselves up to the liability of providing that info to a third party and they cannot access any tax info on you. So short of you...

I think you should start a blog series or maybe write a book on interview and negotiation techniques. Just reading this post had provided me more information than all of my job interviews added together.
Good advice. I wonder about this bit though

>As for them finding out, I don't know where you are at in the world, but in the US their is no way for them to find out unless you provide them with that information.

Professional networking tends to be a big factor when moving from job to job (this may be extremely different in startup communities). This tends to mean that as your career progresses, you have probably worked with 1 or 2 people at a prospective employer. Those people are generally asked about the perspective hire, including their estimates of what that person has made.

My thought on that would be using third party hearsay to terminate an employee on the grounds of lying (even if you proved their former salary in court) would put you in shaky legal standing for termination. A third party could not know your salary with any amount of certainty without access to confidential information at the former company that would put them in legal trouble for divulging at a new employer. I am in the states, so your millage may vary in other parts of the world on that fact.
I was thinking about this at the negotiation stage, before hiring occurs. I can't imagine that an employer would try this after the hiring stage.

As for salary information, there are other ways to know how much someone else is making without accessing "confidential information". You can find out socially (e.g. from them), knowing their performance combined with position, etc.

EDIT: It is worth noting that these are facts I consider when I am interviewing for a new job, not something I put into practice. I wouldn't tell my current employer this information about a perspective hire, nor would I as an employer ask for this information.

Right you are correct, I think we are speaking past each other and that may be my fault, I read somewhere in the thread about the risk of being terminated if the employer found out and my point was more to that fact.

But yes, you do run the risk of not getting the job for being perceived as lying. For me personally as a (small I employ 4 guys) employer, it would not amount to a hill of beans to me, if I found out a prospect inflated his salary.

I just have a hard time viewing it as lying in the traditional sense. Culturally we negotiate when it comes to jobs and if I asked someone to hand over information that would give me a strong advantage at the negotiation table, I would expect that information to not be accurate.

The only reason to ask that question is to strengthen your position at the negotiating table, so in effect the person asking is being just as dis-ingeniousness as the person inflating. To call foul on the other guy for trying to strengthen his position when the other side is doing the same, reeks of a double standard.

There is a number that will cause you to walk away from the deal. Ask for something higher than that number. Walk away if they won't meet that number.

Your old salary is irrelevant, and only serves to anchor you in a lower range. Don't lie, just politely decline to tell them.

"I'd rather talk about what I'm worth to you".