I see no logical difference between a general-purpose floating nuclear power station and a one which is dedicated to (say) powering an aircraft carrier.
Both floating, both nuclear. Both subjected to the same risks. If anything, the carrier is exposed to greater risk.
1 comment
[ 1.7 ms ] story [ 14.2 ms ] threadI see no logical difference between a general-purpose floating nuclear power station and a one which is dedicated to (say) powering an aircraft carrier.
Both floating, both nuclear. Both subjected to the same risks. If anything, the carrier is exposed to greater risk.