I'm not sure I understand how you came to this title (currently "A discovery disproving Noah’s flood?") for this submission.
The subtitle is "Deep beneath the Black Sea, off the coast of Bulgaria, ancient Greek ships are revealing answers to the mystery of the Noah’s Ark flood."
"The Noah’s Flood theory claimed that as Earth’s last ice age ended, melting polar ice caps caused the Mediterranean waters to rise, which pushed a channel through the mountains to form what is now the Bosporus, resulting in a catastrophic seawater deluge 200 times stronger than Niagara Falls. In months, it estimated, the Black Sea inundated a land mass the size of Ireland, flooding a mile a day."
"With more data to be analysed, it supports the idea that the waters rose unnoticeably, by metres over centuries, even millennia."
This is not about disproving the Bible story, but the theory that the Bible story is based on an actual catastrophic event that inspired the Bible story.
5 comments
[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 19.7 ms ] threadThe subtitle is "Deep beneath the Black Sea, off the coast of Bulgaria, ancient Greek ships are revealing answers to the mystery of the Noah’s Ark flood."
"The Noah’s Flood theory claimed that as Earth’s last ice age ended, melting polar ice caps caused the Mediterranean waters to rise, which pushed a channel through the mountains to form what is now the Bosporus, resulting in a catastrophic seawater deluge 200 times stronger than Niagara Falls. In months, it estimated, the Black Sea inundated a land mass the size of Ireland, flooding a mile a day."
"With more data to be analysed, it supports the idea that the waters rose unnoticeably, by metres over centuries, even millennia."
This is not about disproving the Bible story, but the theory that the Bible story is based on an actual catastrophic event that inspired the Bible story.
It seems there was no such catastrophic event.