8 comments

[ 16.8 ms ] story [ 781 ms ] thread
I think you may have a typo in your title.
Must be a mistake to say 400 in the conclusion. I see 40 thrown around, but 400 twice.
Also likely to spontaneously combust!
I'm not sure which is more likely: threecoins is pointing out how poor the proofreading is on the NIH website, or he himself is careless like so many who post on Hacker News.
Yes, I dont believe it is 400 either. :)
I'm fairly certain an infant at 400°C has bigger problems than SBI.