New YouTube TOS says that it can terminate anyone “not commercially viable” (reddit.com) 18 points by rahuldottech 6y ago ↗ HN
[–] Proven 6y ago ↗ Not surprised. Screw them. [–] verdverm 6y ago ↗ It's sounds more like the clause that a company can terminate a feature that you may be using and making money from if they don't find it financially viable anymore.It's really a pretty standard clause [–] IXxXI 6y ago ↗ I hope we can all agree, being a "standard" clause doesn't exlude it from being absolute bullshit.
[–] verdverm 6y ago ↗ It's sounds more like the clause that a company can terminate a feature that you may be using and making money from if they don't find it financially viable anymore.It's really a pretty standard clause [–] IXxXI 6y ago ↗ I hope we can all agree, being a "standard" clause doesn't exlude it from being absolute bullshit.
[–] IXxXI 6y ago ↗ I hope we can all agree, being a "standard" clause doesn't exlude it from being absolute bullshit.
5 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 26.5 ms ] threadIt's really a pretty standard clause