5 comments

[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 26.5 ms ] thread
Not surprised. Screw them.
It's sounds more like the clause that a company can terminate a feature that you may be using and making money from if they don't find it financially viable anymore.

It's really a pretty standard clause

I hope we can all agree, being a "standard" clause doesn't exlude it from being absolute bullshit.
(comment deleted)
What does "not commercially viable" means? Sounds vague.