Somebody had to do this. Let's actively avoid the delusional masses
How to start: Email me your core beliefs ( though I personally prefer a voice chat with on Skype, google hangouts etc.), especially the beliefs where you think you differ fundamentally from the vast majority of people. I will quiz you on various subjects ( and so can you) to see if our beliefs align. Overall my beliefs can be loosely labeled as: generally anarchist (i.e a live and let live approach), generally anti-authoritarian ( meaning I believe govt/authorities do not protect your interests), largely capitalist( i.e vehemently opposed to coercive co-operation, put forth by typical socialism) etc. Perhaps at the bare minimum we have to share a meta belief that it is necessary to reach out and cooperate with other like minded individuals as it is virtually impossible to 'de-delude' the idiotic masses though arguments/dialogs etc. My email address can be found on my profile. In my profile you will also find a link to some webpages that outline my beliefs.
After this step, if we think our beliefs align, I will add you to an an online forum ( zero people as of now) , where you can interact with other people that I will be screening.
Caveats:
-It often takes a very long time ( months to years) to form mutually beneficial alliances. ( more so when individuals are geographically isolated from each other.) Perseverance and patience will be very important.
-The online forum is not to rant against the world, or a place to discuss your core beliefs. ( I would think forums for that already exist). This is more of a place for doers.
Side note: It’s really hard to for me to believe that someone else is not doing this ( i.e what I’m attempting in this post) already somewhere. Let me know if you are aware of similar efforts, I would be eager to join.
For the critics - do not assume that I'm naive. While certain specifics can be commented/criticized, giving me moral/philosophical advice is not welcome. I'm _not_ looking for it.
10 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 29.1 ms ] threadMoot point: to those flagging my posts - if the post is so objectionable that you have to flag it, it's time to examine yourself rather than play moral police.
For the critics - do not assume that I'm naive. While certain specifics can be commented/criticized, giving me moral/philosophical advice is not welcome. I'm _not_ looking for it.
Edit: which is to say, there are plenty of idiots on the right, but if you consider yourself “woke”, I’m not interested in an alliance with you because from my perspective you are part of the idiotic masses.
I fully understand that my post may portray me as someone totally rigid, but there is only so much I can write without making it into a huge essay. Remember there are nuances for every issue out there. What I'm generally interested is people who can understand nuances if needed. Not people who think they have understood it. To quote an example that you just mentioned, people take a hard line stand when it comes to climate change. As far as I'm concerned the answer is that I do not know if climate change is occurring, because I'm fully aware that the scientific community is also prone to bias and climate model are extremely complex to the point that one cannot assess the impact of each variable. I do know for sure, that pollution is real. I do know for sure that for many people climate change is their religion ( replacing traditional religion), meaning they have made the least attempts to understand the nuances. In short I do not consider myself judgemental _if_ a person can get into the nuances of an issue.
(put a link to a good definition if there is one)