Poll HN: Are you more likely to apply to YC now that you could get $150K?
I'm curious if the offer of a guaranteed investment of $150K would convince people who wouldn't otherwise be interested to try YC, or if the amount of money YC startups are getting is largely irrelevant.
24 comments
[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 46.8 ms ] threadI'd expect to see much more Wattvisions and Wakemates in the future, and more B2B software with a longer, difficult selling curve. The founders will likely be drawing the same thin salaries at first in these situations, and the extra cash will go to product and customer development.
Edit: Of course without outside funding, I'm currently 4 years away from that attempt. Which may seem like an eternity to some people.
For that small a price, I can fund the idea myself, and own the company 100%.
But that's the point of the incubator. Maybe it's good for a broke kid out of college. But any seasoned professional in his late 20s-30s, "should" have the sufficient funds to support himself, and fund his vision.
But as someone else has said, maybe the benefit of the program, is the mentorship that can help focus your ideas, and bring it to market.
I still plan to apply for this round but shall monitor the kind of startups YC funds in the future to determine how the probabilities change. It depends on how the selectors respond to changes in the applicant demographics.
My real problem is that they, and other incubators to an even greater extent, have cultivated a hippy atmosphere where scraping by on peanuts is glorified and everyone drones on with a humorless "I'm not in it for the money." Pass.
Which only really opens an opportunity for someone else;<).
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9986
For sure they don't encourage older people to apply.
It has been several days of discussion. There is little discussion that this is a loan, which must be paid back, or at the lender's discretion can convert into equity, without a value cap.
Nor has anyone asked or answered - how much equity are we talking about? It does make a big difference and without knowing both that and the details of each business, no one can say if this is a good deal for either side.
Much discussion acts like this is free money, or winning the lottery, or even that it's a straight trade of equity for cash.
Analysis is at the level of observation that "150 is greater than 17" therefore "it is a better deal now". But "150 is greater than 17" has little to do with anything, and such level of analysis is as financially naive as the prudence shown by those who bought million dollar houses and thought they could afford it because the initial payments were $500 a month, but which came with a variable APR that undergoes a big increase after 12 months, and then has a balloon payment greater than the original mortgage value if you make it to the end of the loan. But the monthly payment is $500 so why not eh, and ignore all other details of the contract. It seems like the financial skills here stop at is one number bigger than the other, and anything involving percentages, conditions, or interest is simply overlooked because it is beyond people's mathematical skills.
Poor math skills and an inability to read contracts are common in our society and this weakness is definitely exploited in many situations.