6 comments

[ 6.1 ms ] story [ 23.7 ms ] thread
This seems like a really interesting post, but the text width is just 22.4% of `<body>` width... sure I can zoom in, but then the font is obnoxiously large.

It seems like maybe it's a mobile theme being misapplied to a desktop user agent? FF 71 on macOS.

edit: `#wrap { max-width: 45em; }` is the culprit. If I remove that the un-maxed `width: 70%;` is much better.

It seems like she's just maxing out the width at what's commonly considered the most readable line length (~80 characters). Not sure what the problem is with that.
It's great in my terminal editor. How many people use a browser at that width? If they do, guess what, it works anyway because it's a relative width. Why force (such a small) maximum?
The article starts with "a short series of programming challenge I’m writing with Julian". What is a "Julian" in this context? I thought it meant "Julia", the programming language, but then I see that her solution is in fact in Go.
Julian is the person she is collaborating with. If you follow the link after that sentence there is a link to his blog.
Oh, thanks, that makes sense. I feel stupid now :)