Showing some example of particularly egregious thought leadership and maybe an animation of it being silenced would go a long way towards helping. I blocked twitter.com in a hosts file, so I can't see if it embeds any tweets.
Any community-driven blocklist is bound to be infiltrated by bigots, no thanks. I just watched a Project Veritas (which is in this blocklist)exposé of a Bernie staffer saying "Gulags were a lot better than the CIA has told us".
Sure, you can choose a version that only blocks ads and social if you want, if you look at the original github repo. The ad blocking list should be fairly reasonable to anyone.
It probably is, unlike nazi death camps, gulag prisoner behave more like city dwellers in the middle of Siberia. There were no fences because of you leave the camp/city there’s almost 0 chance to survive. Condition were brutal during Stalin years, primarily due to lack of food. A number of cities started as gulags/incorporated gulags still exist in Siberia/Arctic.
If you picture a camp with fences and prison guards, yeah that’s wrong.
If you think I’m defending gulags, note that all of what I’ve said are objective and can be factually proven/disproved. If you feel that way, you probably should investigate your own bias (i.e does my feeling preclude me from believing in facts?)
It is not hard to be better than a concentration camp, there is a huge range of bad above the nazi camp level. I read Gulag Archipelago, so yes I might have a bias.
> gulag prisoner behave more like city dwellers
I don't even know what to make of this
> A number of cities started as gulags/incorporated gulags still exist in Siberia/Arctic
The ones exploring natural resources would be my guess, first with forced labor, then as a normal economy after this.
It would be nice if it mentioned how it works as well as who it will be affecting.
Is it unfollowing these people, is it muting them, etc?
Clicking "continue with twitter" asks for a lot of stuff including "Mute, block, and report accounts for you.", "Follow and unfollow accounts for you.", and "Post and delete Tweets for you".
Once you log in, you can see a bunch of accounts and either mute/unmute one-by-one or in bulk.
Twitter doesn’t give very many options for developers (read, read/write, read/write/dms). So unfortunately in order to POST to /mutes, the app gets access to more than it needs.
Maybe it has something to do with how Twitter will suggest tweets to you that meet their algorithms' threshold for popularity when the account that tweeted them is simply one that the people you follow also happened to follow.
Plus I think there are socially left-leaning people in tech who want nothing to do with anything distinctly related to capitalism, and so ousting investors from their circles is seen as "good praxis" or whatever they call it.
To be honest, I don't really understand this meme of investors on twitter being universally bad or something one would want to mute out.
A well known investor on twitter actually did the 'follow, wait for follow back, then after some time unfollow' thing on me recently. When people do this, as a rule I unfollow them again when I notice, but for this person I actually didn't because they genuinely tweet interesting and useful things that I appreciate having in my feed!
They're not all bad, far from it. But sometimes a few actors poisons the well of a whole label (ehm, shark tank), causing some people to have an allergic reaction to the whole class (even if it isn't true that all of them are bad).
I don't understand the allergy mechanism, though. Can't you just... mute the bad actors? I can't grasp the frame of mind where I'd need to preemptively mute people who are (believed by some guy known only as "Tom" to be) shallow VCs.
I mean the boring answer is that people have patience and energy constraints. They arbitrarily ignore the whole group because VC isn't adjacent enough to their life goals, or something, to warrant the energy necessary to pick out the patience-stealers from the insight-givers.
It's a javascript program. It's not going to be blazing fast by any reasonable definition. Ironic that a program designed to filter out Silicon Valley bullshit has succumbed to Silicon Valley bullshit.
Ryan Hoover is generally pretty innocuous and is also the founder of ProductHunt, something builders might want to hear about. And ShrugCap pretty much just makes fun of SV VC.
56 comments
[ 6.2 ms ] story [ 124 ms ] threadwas a gimmicky hack i threw together over the holiday so i could turn on/off vc twitter easily.
Edit nvm found it at the footer:
https://github.com/tmm/mute.vc
127.0.0.1 www.twitter.com
In Firefox for example you can right click a site in history and click "Forget this site" which will reset all of the caches that keeps it working
Check the bottom of the list for the social ones.
Edit: https://github.com/StevenBlack/hosts repo link.
If you picture a camp with fences and prison guards, yeah that’s wrong.
If you think I’m defending gulags, note that all of what I’ve said are objective and can be factually proven/disproved. If you feel that way, you probably should investigate your own bias (i.e does my feeling preclude me from believing in facts?)
> gulag prisoner behave more like city dwellers
I don't even know what to make of this
> A number of cities started as gulags/incorporated gulags still exist in Siberia/Arctic
The ones exploring natural resources would be my guess, first with forced labor, then as a normal economy after this.
> If you think I’m defending gulags
It does sound like it, you even put a disclaimer
Maybe Twitter is running a webworker?
Is it unfollowing these people, is it muting them, etc?
Clicking "continue with twitter" asks for a lot of stuff including "Mute, block, and report accounts for you.", "Follow and unfollow accounts for you.", and "Post and delete Tweets for you".
https://github.com/tmm/mute.vc/tree/master/.github/screensho...
Once you log in, you can see a bunch of accounts and either mute/unmute one-by-one or in bulk.
Twitter doesn’t give very many options for developers (read, read/write, read/write/dms). So unfortunately in order to POST to /mutes, the app gets access to more than it needs.
Wait, what kind of use-case is there for this?
If I didn't want to hear from someone, wouldn't I not follow them in the first place?
What is the use case here?
Plus I think there are socially left-leaning people in tech who want nothing to do with anything distinctly related to capitalism, and so ousting investors from their circles is seen as "good praxis" or whatever they call it.
overall, this was a little hack that everyone i talked to thought was funny.
(I wonder if it should reflect on the retweeter, positively or negatively).
[0] https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/a/2015/sharing-block-lists-to...
blocking is more extreme - neither user can view each other's content (says you are blocked by @username).
A well known investor on twitter actually did the 'follow, wait for follow back, then after some time unfollow' thing on me recently. When people do this, as a rule I unfollow them again when I notice, but for this person I actually didn't because they genuinely tweet interesting and useful things that I appreciate having in my feed!
After that, a Promoted Tweet muter would find wide appreciation (using uBO for that now).
The Twitter list you use is configurable.
My one thought is you could probably move the usernames over to a file you could version control with the idea of accepting PRs.
Great idea - thought about doing it, but was out of scope for a holiday hack because of Twitter’s rate limiting.
It's a javascript program. It's not going to be blazing fast by any reasonable definition. Ironic that a program designed to filter out Silicon Valley bullshit has succumbed to Silicon Valley bullshit.
I think bashing on software built with JavaScript is far more "Silicon Valley bullshit" than the act of writing it :)
Ryan Hoover is generally pretty innocuous and is also the founder of ProductHunt, something builders might want to hear about. And ShrugCap pretty much just makes fun of SV VC.