5 comments

[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 23.9 ms ] thread
This is an excellent idea. From unfortunate experience, I know this will struggle to be real in a hospital that's suffering with Epic. The company is strictly against open standards (https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2020/01/22/epic-ceo-sends-letter-ur...). The Epic scam continues unabated, but I wonder if there's a way to add more explicit rejections (or constraints) for Epic environments?
"the HL7 FHIR standard"

Which one? R4? STU3? -> http://hl7.org/fhir/directory.html

AFAIK, the different versions aren't compatible with each other. How will that affect this library?

Good point. As of now, we only tested it with STU3. I think something we definitely miss is a test module that allows for version compatibility checks.
I'll be watching this project. I hope you can keep advancing it. Maybe put a note on the README about version compatibility and a call to action for testing new versions as they come out?