Ask HN: What interesting problems are you working on?
I know there are lots of really interesting problems out there waiting to be solved, but I haven't been exposed to much in the software world besides web technologies.
I'd love to hear about what interesting problems (technically or otherwise) you're working on -- and if you're willing to share more, I'm curious how you ended up working on them.
Thank you :)
708 comments
[ 4.3 ms ] story [ 473 ms ] threadStarted because of frequent multitasking heavy work with limited resources.
Open Beta (macOS) as soon as I finish license verification and delta updates.
https://cleave.app
The basic idea, on and off for close to five years. Started out experimenting with shell session persistence (solved[0], but not quite), then prototyping a browser-concept and playing with browser-extensions, then settling on the OS-level...
[0]: https://github.com/EivindArvesen/prm
Not really a smooth experience in my opinion, doesn't map quite as well to the concept of "working context" as I think of it. Also, you'd have to maintain your list of users, and manually sync any settings, etc. - whereas with Cleave, I'm planning on implementing white- or blacklisting of applications on a context-basis (and system settings etc. are implicitly shared).
> Separate user accounts is kind of the naive (and not quite complete) solution to the same problem.
I too have attempted to solve this problem with user accounts; and yeah it doesn't work well. Files are a pain to share, the log-out-log-back-in process takes forever, and a bunch of preferences don't sync across user accounts.
I particularly like the idea of having a super-low-energy mode where it's just for writing or reading, and saved states for my countless research sessions. Also, being able to freeze my dev workspace and resume it any point sounds amazing.
Excited to try it out!
I'm on Linux, so I won't be able to use your app, but great idea and good luck!
Also it'd would be a data integrity nightmare because if one context shared the apps from another. How would you manage memory corruption, and allocation and saving in this sort of scenario.
Anyway, sounds awesome.
Good luck
Lots of webscraping.
Maybe we can compare notes?
Also, working on how to integrate a small team of hackers into a big team of production oriented engineers. Making the first of something is such a different skill set to making thousands more.
I got here by getting headhunted for a neat-sounding job after a project elsewhere ended, and then assuming more and more duties until my title had to change to match my responsibilities.
Also I bet you’re excited for starlink.
Is this related to the refractivity of the near surface atmosphere above the waters surface affecting directionality and bandwidth?
I'm mostly heads down coding every day, building an MVP. Also trying to find some investor interest where possible, however fundraising has never been something I'm good at.
It is a next generation carbon offset marketplace.
We've had a ton of great feedback from customers, and we are working on several new sleep technologies that we plan to release this year.
It's also been interesting to apply the lean methodology to hardware. Iteration cycles are long, but I'd argue that lean is just as important for hardware as it is for software.
[0] https://bedtimebulb.com/
https://www.ies.org/fires/circadian-lighting-an-engineers-pe...
- The metrics Circadian Stimulus and Melanopic Lux are flawed
- We don't know enough to produce products yet
I agree with him on point 1, especially about CS. The author, and several others, have demonstrated a huge discontinuity around 3500K. The CS model needs improvement.
Regarding melanopic lux, the author says it is more a problem with our measurement and modeling tools. Most manufacturers won't provide a Spectral Power Distribution, but this is starting to change (we do). There is at least one clinical trial in progress that is testing this metric directly, and several experts think it shows a lot of promise.
With that said, new research on blue vs. yellow/orange opponency is coming out. Basically, we're trying to figure out contribution of the visual system on top of melanopsin. I'm not sure what to make of it yet, but I think we'll find out much more in the next 2 years. We probably need a better metric than melanopic lux.
On point 2, I agree that our knowledge is changing. But it takes a number of years for standards to be developed, much slower than the rate of technology improvement. We are paying attention to all the new research, but we based our design on our best understanding of the research to date.
We know that we can really only attract early adopters at this stage who "get" it, and that most people are going to wait and see until things are more standardized. But we are effectively able to do mini-experiments with our customers, which can lead to more insights/avenues of experimentation.
Case-in-point: f.lux. Research has shown that it is somewhat effective on its own, but combined with dimming, it could be quite effective. That's actually what we're doing with our product—controlling both the spectrum and intensity. And f.lux is able to run experiments with a portion of their users to advance our understanding.
Basically, my opinion is that we have to start somewhere, and we believe we have enough evidence supporting that our solution is "better than nothing." We were able to prove that there is enough of a market for these types of solutions already, even though our knowledge is still evolving.
(edited for a paragraph spacing typo and a 2nd time for a grammar issue)
You may think extremely bright SAD lights is already readily available, but there's anecdotal evidence to suggest they are insufficient
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/koRZu53LBZEapwww6/could-some...
1. https://www.benkuhn.net/lux
Big core temperature changes usually make me feel sleepy.
Quite a long story short, I managed to get the mental illness under control; something I thought I'd be living with the rest of my life.
My research has included mostly standing/walking meditation, and reading a lot on philosophy, religion, psychology, and such.
This is a personal project I've only just sort of revealed, after some persuasion by my peers. I didn't really have much intention on putting out in the public but it has turned out to be something significant. There is a lot to say about it.
EDIT: If you're curious, here is what I came up with after I started recording my research. DISCLAIMER: there is some personal stuff I talk about.
https://github.com/myles-moylan/head_project
Thank you
I've always loved going on walks, and they've just turned out to be a good way to work through mental/emotional stuff. Walking helps you stay in the moment as well, and when you're focusing your attention on the moment there's always new things to sense.
Let me know if that's not clear enough.
EDIT:
Another important part of meditation is the analysis of your thoughts and emotions. Whatever comes up, try to understand why it did as well as you can.
About analyzing thoughts - I tend to over analyze everything. How do you not fall into this trap?
It's really a best effort sort of thing. But the more you practice, and the more effort you put forward, the stronger you'll get and the easier it will be to filter the signal from the noise.
Walking while meditating. There's a common misconception that you need to be sitting or lying down to meditate *or even need to be in a dark candle lite room lol). Meditating is a state of mind.
He's doing an overview of huge fields, not an in-depth, point-by-point argument. You sometimes have to fill in details of his argument yourself, because he doesn't answer every possible counter-argument.
I've been reading about this for years and recently started sending out short summaries of what I've learned (typically geared at how the lessons can by applied practically).
Last week I shared how Nobel laureates are 22 times more likely to have a side hobby as a performer than their peers.
Ultimately, I am trying to land on a succinct answer to "how do you channel broad interests and talents into an impactful career?"
(this is my email: https://stewfortier.com/subscribe)
I too have really broad interests...I find basically everything interesting, which is both a blessing and a curse, as I'm sure you've experienced. I'd love to talk about this more...do you feel you've come to any kind of answer on how to focus your wide interests?
One theme I'm starting to converge on is the idea of a generalist as an "expert" at a) maintaining a wide range of mental models and skillsets and b) developing a sense of which type of problems to apply each to.
In other words, effective generalists become good at knowing which speciality or approach should be applied to a problem, even if they "only" grasp the basics of any one discipline.
Example:
A software engineer wants to develop deeper friendships. They may think that building an app that reminds them to keep in touch with friends will help.
Of course they think that... software is what they know best.
But a generalist may take a different angle and see that the root cause isn't an automation / information problem, it may be a human psychology issue.
"The real problem is that you don't believe you're worthy of love. If you work on that, you may feel confident enough to want to reach out more."
The next email is going to start outlining the most practical, effective mini-mental models that generalists can use to solve practical problems.
That's a really interesting, but sensible, conclusion to come to. It seems to follow that generalists would make great business/personal coaches, as they're good at pointing people in the right direction. I'd be curious to look at great coaches and see if they had a ton of different interests.
I'm stoked for the next email :)
It's also somewhat of a relief to read.
I think intuitively many people feel that range matters, but fear that we'll sound like we lack a "speciality" or even "hard skills" if we proclaim ourselves generalists or broadly curious.
https://bustl-app.com - A SaaS product that acts as a personal assistant that will integrate with a range of different apps.
- how to do digital identity in health and public services for ~15m people
- replacing enterprise/waterfall security risk assessment with collaboration and iteration.
- applying product management methods in the public sector
site: http://collectibleapp.com/
project: https://github.com/marcelaguiar/Collectible
Mostly I agree on hating things requiring a login but I'm okay with it in this case.
Any other insights you’ve discovered? I tracked my data for a year and discovered strawberries were a potent mood enhancer.
A centralized place to record things like that: - Arts: cinema, theater, books, ... - Travels: from, to, flight? car? - etc...
Started writing some code but let it for other things, maybe I would come back.
https://www.paced.email
I'd love to hear how you'd use it.
> At the end of each period, a single email is sent to the real email address containing all of the messages the alias received over that timeframe.
Why not send each received mail individually? If you aggregate them first, it makes it very difficult to reply to individual messages with standard email clients.
I use a similar but far less fancy approach with email filters: I have everything put into its own filtered folders then only check them on a schedule.
Your approach is good because the schedule is right there in the email address.
Food for thought.
I mean use github@johndoe.paced.email And have an admin ui that lets you set "github@johndoe.paced.email" =>"weekly"
Then you don't even need a website.
As we connect classrooms and scale across different countries, the problem set has grown exponentially.
https://3dprintingindustry.com/news/3d-printing-impact-on-de...
EDIT: Sorry, I missed the reviews part. Do you mean easily getting a second opinion based on diagnostic imaging?
Edit: Not in US, but building planning to launch there. You can't practice dentistry in US if you haven't got US diploma. However, diagnostic dental work (at least in some states) is exception to this.
What work, generally?
For some reason I keep hearing about people flying to Serbia to do this.
An ex-dentist attempted to strong arm me into a receiving an occlusal adjustment because my TMJ popped during a single visit. I knew this permanent procedure is rarely the best solution for the scenario. The dentist subsequently became irate and told me, "You'll lose all your teeth and look like an AIDs patient!" You can probably guess what era he's from.
I wanted to file a complaint, but it would've been my word against his, his assistant, and his hygienist. Absolutely ridiculous situation. It also provided a snapshot into how medical professionals exploit patient ignorance for revenue.
This eliminates so much fraud and mistakes.
However, it's a bell curve. There are extremely moral and extremely immoral people. Some of them are dentists.
Absolutely true. However, it seems that other areas of medecine have better systems in place to prevent abuse, and dentristry would do well to follow suit.
Let's focus on the second part of that statement. It means that majority of cost of dental care goes to the practitioner, rather than to drug makers. This means they have more reason to cheat. The payoff is higher.
Research that showed the 28% figure: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3036573
I’m actually a dental student myself, and it saddens me that a significant chunk of dentists take advantage of the of the self-policing inherent to the field. It generates generalized distrust and resentment among the rest of dentists, in addition to being simply unfair.
As far as I know, there are no diagnosis codes in dentistry, just treatment codes. If it were, I imagine it could be possible to prevent this problem by randomly and routinely validating patients charts.
On a side note, it is a budding dream of mine to build a start up related to dentistry, particularly in the realm of dental informatics, but not limited to it. I was wondering if you would be willing to chat with me about your experience sometime. It sounds fascinating.
Thanks again.
Let's say you are Delta Dental, these 28% are basically an insurance fraud. If you could get rid of it, you would save billions. You could offer lower premiums and full coverage without any copays.