8 comments

[ 0.21 ms ] story [ 34.2 ms ] thread
Worth noting this is not James Woods, the known actor and hater. This is James Wood, the author and literary critic.
Thanks for clarifying, as I was wondering why anybody would listen to what James Woods has to say...
He's still useful. If, for some reason, you find yourself agreeing with him, you immediately know you're wrong.
Reading this as the work of actor James Woods is funny, but reading it as a literal sentient, personified, block of wood is even better: "What are we to think, then, about a critic criticizing a critic? Do I intend to get you to see Sebald or Roth as I see Wood seeing them? But of course, to see Wood as I see him is, in part, to see how Wood sees."
If he gets really excited about something, it's usually worth checking out. That makes him a useful critic.