Hard to know the extent to which likelihood to test for COVID-19 varies by latitude. Still, apriori knowledge of these types of viruses makes this a pretty good guess. Summer can't come fast enough.
That depends. The thing that seems to be worrying public health professionals is the potential for a second, larger resurgence in the autumn. If that hits at the same time as an even moderately bad flu season, things will get really ugly.
I hope they're right but I worry these conclusions are premature.
There's evidence of community transmission in Singapore which currently has rather warm and humid weather.
Honestly just look at the current world map[0] - it seems the statistics in this paper may be out of date. Not to mention were starting to see early spread in third world countries like India which are unlikely to comprehensively test for it, at least not in the short term. The data in this paper may be biased.
Given the relatively slow progression of the outbreaks, if Italy is any model, India and South America are about to have a bad time in the next 3-6 weeks. Let's hope otherwise.
What do you mean by "so many"? Singapore appears to be an amazing success story in containing C19.
They are using aggressive contact tracing as part of that, so if it were spreading like wildfire through A/C vents surely that wouldn't be effective and they would have a much faster growth rate of cases.
I don't think the assertion is that it's spreading through vents, just that spending time in a very air conditioned room mimics some of attributes of winter that make the spread of respiratory viruses more likely (dry air, dry nasal passages)
There may be something to this. If you look at the actual cases in Singapore, they seem to be clustered around two specific locations, one company and a single event which I would presume was held inside a single big hall.
I'm in Singapore, and life here goes on pretty much as it always has. Except for a larger than normal number of people wearing masks, you can't really tell that this is ongoing.
That said, the government is doing a lot to keep it that way. There is intensive contact tracing, and companies register people going in and out of their offices (to help tracing), if you're sick you're supposed to stay at home, and so on.
They didn't make "conclusions" without making it very clear that this is a novel coronavirus and more data is needed. But they do conclude that so far the novel corona virus is acting like other corona viruses in terms of climate sensitivity.
Singapore is an outlier in the region. Though may also be a victim of being proactive about testing.
Another outlier about SNG: you can't go anywhere without catching public transport. Car ownership is essentially unviable for even the above-average person.
People have no choice but to get into highly crowded canisters each day simply to go to work or visit family.
To me that's the big difference regardless of latitude. Another factor is how incredibly popular it is as a Chinese New Year destination along with regular trade.
Apropos of this -- summer brings more UV light, which breaks a fair variety of molecular bonds. But I've yet to come across any data on whether UV deactivates coronavirus. Anyone?
Their March-April visualization shows Italy as being outside of the predicted at-risk zone.
It's March 10th and Italy just announced a nation-wide quarantine, how does this square with the model as predicted? Is it just too early to see? Will we know by April if this model is useless if Italy continues to have covid-19 spreading?
But it does mean countries coming into Winter should be worried.
Personally I think they should have been letting is spread before hand and burning out as many paths in the network as possible while it's somewhat containable.
I wouldn't want to be going into Winter.
That graph with the two lines one peaked the other flattened does leave out the capacity of hospitals goes to very very low in flu season. It's designed that way.
19 comments
[ 3.8 ms ] story [ 41.1 ms ] threadThere's evidence of community transmission in Singapore which currently has rather warm and humid weather.
Honestly just look at the current world map[0] - it seems the statistics in this paper may be out of date. Not to mention were starting to see early spread in third world countries like India which are unlikely to comprehensively test for it, at least not in the short term. The data in this paper may be biased.
Given the relatively slow progression of the outbreaks, if Italy is any model, India and South America are about to have a bad time in the next 3-6 weeks. Let's hope otherwise.
0. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_...
They are using aggressive contact tracing as part of that, so if it were spreading like wildfire through A/C vents surely that wouldn't be effective and they would have a much faster growth rate of cases.
I'm in Singapore, and life here goes on pretty much as it always has. Except for a larger than normal number of people wearing masks, you can't really tell that this is ongoing.
That said, the government is doing a lot to keep it that way. There is intensive contact tracing, and companies register people going in and out of their offices (to help tracing), if you're sick you're supposed to stay at home, and so on.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_coronavirus_outbreak_in_S...
Another outlier about SNG: you can't go anywhere without catching public transport. Car ownership is essentially unviable for even the above-average person.
People have no choice but to get into highly crowded canisters each day simply to go to work or visit family.
To me that's the big difference regardless of latitude. Another factor is how incredibly popular it is as a Chinese New Year destination along with regular trade.
It's March 10th and Italy just announced a nation-wide quarantine, how does this square with the model as predicted? Is it just too early to see? Will we know by April if this model is useless if Italy continues to have covid-19 spreading?
But it does mean countries coming into Winter should be worried.
Personally I think they should have been letting is spread before hand and burning out as many paths in the network as possible while it's somewhat containable.
I wouldn't want to be going into Winter.
That graph with the two lines one peaked the other flattened does leave out the capacity of hospitals goes to very very low in flu season. It's designed that way.