Launch HN: Terusama (YC W20) – We help warehouses schedule trucks
The status quo here is really antiquated software that is really hard to use. Not only is the current way of doing things inefficient for logistics folks, it has a big impact. The inefficiency created by poor supply-chain coordination costs $30B a year in the U.S. and generates billions of tons of C02, mostly from trucks idling in parking lots. On top of that, it has a huge impact on the lives of truck drivers, who are legally limited to 11 hours of driving time each day. Waiting at warehouses often eats up 3-4 of those. Those wasted hours really add up, making the job unsustainable for many and contributing to another problem in the industry - driver turnover, which is over 90%.
Most of this inefficiency is caused by the high level of friction in communication between the people who manage trucks, the drivers, and the people who the drivers are delivering to. The freight industry has made a ton of progress with software to help manage their fleets, but warehouse logistics software hasn’t caught up.
Chris and I were students together at Indiana University. We became really interested in this space at our later jobs. I was working at Uber Freight (formerly Otto), and Chris was consulting for companies in the industry. We were constantly amazed at how big and complex an issue it was, and surprised that nobody was thinking about it in the same way we were. We started talking to as many people in the industry as possbile to figure a better way to manage logistics. The result was the version of Terusama we launched with in the beginning of the year. We have been since iterating on the product with a core group of customers.
We streamline or automate most of the repetitive and administrative processes needed to keep trucks flowing smoothly in and out of a facility. We provide dispatchers at trucking companies and brokerages a way to search through facilities, and schedule directly with these facilities. When a truck driver arrives at a warehouse, we check them in at a kiosk. Our customers get a dashboard where they can track and manage loads coming to their facility. Logistics teams get visibility into their incoming trucks, the ability to communicate with drivers and carriers, and to track a load through its lifecycle (from staging through completion). Everyone involved is kept in the loop with smart notifications. In the future, an API will make it easy for anyone with a brokerage or trucking company to get facility availability (to feed into truck routing optimization), and schedule appointments. We’ll also offer services to help carriers reduce the risk of missing truck appointments.
One of the most important things we’ve learned in this time is how important reliability is for a mission-critical app. It's obvious in retrospect, but it definitely changes your approach when building an application - requiring heavier testing, redundancy, and support as a form of redundancy.
These days you hear a lot about things like autonomy and AI in the freight industry. We believe that to get the value promised by these things, we first have to upgrade the outdated technology infrastructure that currently runs the industry. Our goal is to build that infrastructure, while solving today’s pressing problems.
We’re excited to see what HN thinks of our platform. We’re eager to hear about HN users’ experiences, ideas, and know there is a ton of expertise among the community to learn from. And if you’re in the industry, we’d love ...
28 comments
[ 15.4 ms ] story [ 1498 ms ] threadback the day, I helped to roll out a similar, rather primitive system, at Amazon across their german fulfillment centers. Just the added visibility of that was mind blowing. Also increased pressure on operations, I don't consider this a bad thing.
If you want to chat, more then welcome! also I'd love to hear about how you approach that problem. Because it is huge one, also one most companies totally ignore.
I help run a distribution company and I'm not clear who this is for? Is it for my own trucks i.e. scheduling trucks between our locations and/or customers? Is it for when we use a 3rd party logistics company i.e. scheduling time with them to come pick up and deliver our goods? Or is the product FOR the 3rd party logistics company that is handling our goods?
Is this usable without two (or more) of the parties using this software?
Would love to hear more. There are many issues in this space and love the fact newer startups are getting into it.
Hello! We sell to you, the person who runs a warehouse/distribution center. We are trying to augment the functionalities of a receiving coordinator. Instead of using the phone or email to schedule appointments at your distribution center, you can use Terusama. What can we say to make this more clear in the future?
> Is this usable without two (or more) of the parties using this software?
Could you clarify your question? We are not a TMS/WMS. We have one customer who still scheduled appointments manually, but uses our kiosks to check truck drivers in & out.
Glad you are as excited as we are!
Terusama looks like it's focused on the warehouse, factory, or DC (Distribution Centre) which I think is fantastic, we have had a lot of drivers complain about how long they can spend waiting at DCs so I believe there is a big market here, especially for large businesses. Coca-Cola, Supermarkets etc
Shameless plug, We have a DMS (Delivery Management System) https://www.subtrux.com/manage/ if you run your own fleet or want to subcontract jobs
I'll also mention a personal observation of the federal regulations of hours. It caused me more grief than any other aspect of driving. I know when I can drive safely or not, and can contend with a single nag. Having two, eg my company <i>and</i> the regulations, forced me to drive in some pretty difficult circumstances. The hours of service issue is a powerful potential marketing point for your endeavor - one seriously neglected by shippers and receivers, and carriers. Regulations are necessary, but they do introduce complexities that are not insignificant.
I hope your efforts succeed in improving an industry that begs it. Unfortunately my coding is shit and I can be of no service there, hence me going OTR in the first place.
And if you do succeed, you'll be doing good not only for drivers, but the industry and public safety too.
It’s unfortunate that this happens so much.
Many dispatchers simply do not care about public safety. After all, they are not going to be responsible in case of an accident.
What many people don’t understand is how sometimes dispatchers are able to manipulate unsuspecting drivers, especially new drivers without much experience.
And like, https://terusama.com was available.
https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Teru-sama
You've obliterated Bulbagarden's ranking for the term
edit: the name is explained here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22552385
Are there any plans to handle truck tracking before they reach the warehouse? I know that's a huge lift, but I would imagine that could make a major difference in scheduling.
Good luck!
Great question! Not at the moment. We feel there are quite a few people trying to solve load availability(tracking trucks while between facilities), and it is a gnarly problem. I don't believe there is any one, silver-bullet solution to tracking. It will require a multi-pronged attack-plan, and at it's core requires truck drivers to be incentivized into sharing this data.
Correct!
> Does the software limit them to particular docks that are compatible with their truck, e.g side unload with a forklift vs rear unload with a pallet rider?
This would work. A 'dock' in Terusama has a type. Right now, everyone on our platform fits nice and neatly into 'van', and 'flatbed'. When assigning docks, we take into account what type of dock the appointment needs, and which docks are available to service that appointment.
> Does it take into account resource availability as well as dock availability, e.g a double trailer still takes one dock but can take much longer to unload?
This problem is the worst, and I don't have quite a good solution in mind yet. Right now we have the concept of, 'appointment types', and an appointment type can have a slot count. So, you could have a, 'double-wide' appointment-type, which would take up two slots on your schedule. So if your standard appointment is an hour, double-wide appointments would take two hours.
This gets messy when the warehouse wants longer appointments based on who the customer is, or who scheduled the load. I want to build some sort of rules engine, but can't justify the complexity just yet.
> Also a warehouse might be limited to how much work per hour they can process during certain times of the day, e.g morning vs afternoon and during lunch breaks or shift changes.
We handle this! Will build it more out in the future, but I just allow you to block off docks for certain times of the day. So a lunch break, would just be blocking off every dock at a certain time of day, and setting that block to repeat, daily.
Another tricky problem I thought of would be a double trailer that can be side loaded would take a single dock, but a double trailer that has to be rear unloaded would take two docks. Also zoning docks so a refrigerated truck can't dock at a dry goods dock, or customers may want to make sure certain suppliers use the dock closest to where they need the goods. As in you wouldn't want to unload the truck and then have to move the pallets hundreds of metres to the storage location.
Don’t know if that’s possible but I think it would need to start by integrating all loadboards. Imagine a unified loadboard where even small brokers & carriers could easily do everything. With every load booked, all logistics for shipping & receiving could be automatized.
But I would love to be proven wrong.
(ymmv linguistically I suppose depending where you haul from/how much time you spent in freeway lay-bys fixing your pickup/bandmobile/trabbi but there's a lot of important social going on in these times and at least in the past Indy drivers got themselves booked and did their paperwork meanwhile)
We could use this. We have lots of carriers and this could make life much easier.