21 comments

[ 4.5 ms ] story [ 53.4 ms ] thread
Hm. I see this as a play for DRM locking things across the stack. Deep scan and data analysis software would be ripe for implementing this. Maybe I'm just paranoid.
This seems like a huge waste of money to me.
This is one of those deals that make absolutely no sense to me. Even less sense in fact then the Time Warner/AOL debacle.

Can someone explain any drop of rationale Intel might have for doing this? I am coming up empty.

It's a long term investment to bring security down to the hardware level.
Bringing security down to the hardware level only means you'll be enabling virus-access to the hardware level because hardware will never keep up with software.
"Bringing security down to the hardware level only means you'll be enabling virus-access to the hardware level"

How does that follow? We've had "security" at the hardware level for years. The hardware is as accessible as it'll ever be -- it's only going to get more locked down from here.

A better investment would be to fix the holes in the first place.

Or, better yet, spend that money to educate users and administrators alike on how to protect themselves.

1) How are they responsible for the holes? 2) How would this make them money?
I could easily see it becoming BigCo policy to only use hardware with Enterprise Security Robustness(tm), if only as an ass-covering move.
(comment deleted)
Fixing security vulnerabilities in every piece of software ever written (or to be written) seems like a hell of a lot more work than hardening the processor. Non-executable memory, for example, eliminates a whole class of vulnerabilities in which illicitly added code is run from the stack or heap.

To suggest that further work on the processor security model is a waste because people ought to have done it right the first time is blind to the fact that people will screw up no matter what.

Perhaps Intel plans on giving the Mcafee virus scanner away for free. The resulting bogged down and slow computers would lead to increased demand for more powerful Intel CPUs.

/sarcasm

Long shot, but has it got anything to do with real estate? Intel and McAfee HQs are located within a mile of each other... again, its a crazy angle, just putting it out there.
Intel CEO: I need some anti-virus. Can someone buy me McAfee?

Minion [2 hours later]: OK, Done.

I have come across persons who cannot remove McAfee from their machines.
Maybe someone should start selling software to scan for such hard-to-dislodge software and remove it. An anti-anti-virus scanner.
Sun went for less. Oracle sure got a great deal.
Probably more like Intel got a bad deal.
Story is 2 hours old and has a bad href displayed as text in the body of the article. Is there no quality control at techcrunch?