My favorite "fun" fact about The Jungle was that Sinclair originally meant the book to expose the working conditions of the meat packing plants, but instead everyone focused on the way the meat was processed and got up in arms about that instead. He apparently also had to tone down some of the book's more socialist leanings before being allowed to publish it.
The irony is that it is the exact opposite of the typical narrative myopia in only caring about people directly mentioned. Here everyone was horrified by the negligent cannibalism.
I’m not sure it’s what you’re referring to. This seems coronavirus specific. From the original comment I thought that inspections were suspended indefinitely.
Today we have "ag gag" laws that work to stifle speech that alerts citizens to issues related to the provenance of their food. To my eye, such laws are blatantly unconstitutional--but many blatantly unconstitutional things are routinely allowed in the service of Capital these days.
15 comments
[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 23.5 ms ] threadSource: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Jungle
I’m not sure it’s what you’re referring to. This seems coronavirus specific. From the original comment I thought that inspections were suspended indefinitely.
I knew the FDA had drastically reduced the number of slaughterhouse inspectors but regulatory capture is the order of the day after all.
These are not good ideas.
Example: How's that 737 Max fleet?