13 comments

[ 0.23 ms ] story [ 42.7 ms ] thread
Is the "Next: find old wardrobe." supposed to be a Narnia reference? If not I can't figure out what it is for.
Yup. Narnia is a "hidden dimension". A bit of a stretch to compare Narnia with spatial dimensions though.
Good, but on the atomic scale that's still a lot - as I understand it the key questions are how well it works on scales where the "strong" and "weak" forces also apply.
Does it matter though? If it will always be overwhelmed by the weak and strong force as distances narrow (except near/in a black hole or if extra dimensions actually exist)?
When energies are sufficiently high gravity can't be ignored anymore.
If we find a small enough situation where gravity stops working I wonder if there will be an inverse square law observed as they approach that level of tiny. Like half way between the size where gravity works fullest and the tinier size where it doesn’t work anymore is 75% less gravity.
On very small scale the force would be very very high as the denominator, d^2, goes to zero. What limits the denominator going to zero? Could a close distance really be what leads to the strong or weak force?
Was I foolish in thinking that gravity works at all scales?
Well not at all scales. Gravity at quantum scales is still not well understood.

Also the only way to claim it works as expected at any scale is to test it out. This allows scientists to claim that the theory checks out at this scale too.

If gravity is warping of spacetime and works differently/fails to work at very small scales, is it 'space' that really failed?