Probably should not have named a product or URI as ‘albatross’, lest they get a dead one around their neck.
I mean, really, to NOT accept a freee vulnerability and be force-herded through a portal full of terms and condition. Me think IBM lawyers are trying to rope too much of the free Internet in. Oh wait, they did ... and failed.
Oh I thought they were trying to say the reporter isn't elegible for a bounty...but then saw there is no bounty.
Why do they care whom the bug reports come from? Or is it just some ploy so they can discard reports when they want...if so why even have this in the first place??
4 comments
[ 4.3 ms ] story [ 22.5 ms ] threadI mean, really, to NOT accept a freee vulnerability and be force-herded through a portal full of terms and condition. Me think IBM lawyers are trying to rope too much of the free Internet in. Oh wait, they did ... and failed.
Why do they care whom the bug reports come from? Or is it just some ploy so they can discard reports when they want...if so why even have this in the first place??
That's quite the "process error"