Who Just Voted to Let the FBI Seize Your Online Search History with Warrant (gizmodo.com)

Without a warrant... it's kind of an important distinction.

Important distinction: article headline says "Without"

Here's hoping another amendment can be proposed, with much the same verbiage, so this can be voted down.

For some reason, I read 'Who' as 'WHO'.

Actual headline: Here's Who Just Voted to Let the FBI Seize Your Online Search History Without a Warrant

Trick question: No one just voted, it’s been standard practise for almost 20 years, both parties and the courts all support it or at least refuse to take even the smallest action to stop it.

The proposed law would make the FBI require a warrant whereas right now they do not. Clickbaity article but it's still important

If the FBI had nothing to hide.

They wouldn't push for warrantless surveillance.