HN Explorer

16 comments

[ 3.7 ms ] story [ 26.7 ms ] thread
[deleted]
(comment deleted)
JMTQp8lwXL
A surprising number of these folks in the SFBA are willing to relocate.
ponker
Surprising? They're without income in a city where one-bedrooms rent for $4,000 at a time of low labor demand. Not sure what's surprising about being willing to relocate.
hn_throwaway_99
Surprising? When you're unemployed during a major economic downturn lots of people would be willing to leave one of the most expensive cities in the country.
legerdemain
No, I think it is, in fact, somewhat interesting. I was at Uber until a couple of months ago and left for mostly unrelated reasons. A significant proportion of the people I worked with had 3-5 years of tenure at Uber, families, homes. Not people who could relocate easily, even if they wanted to.

There's an obvious and boring explanation for the prevalence of "willing to move" on this list, and that is if the layoffs mostly hit recent and more junior hires. Another company I worked for had a significantly younger and more mobile workforce, and it wasn't uncommon for new hires to move to the bay area from across the country, and then relocate to another regional office or even overseas just as easily.

nojito
Many of the people willing to relocate are <3 years out of school and have only worked at Uber for ~1 year
karthikb
Not surprising in general, but given the reality that SF is the most tech-dense city in the world, it's an interesting observation that people perceive jobs to be scarce enough that the opportunity cost of leaving is worth more immediate employment.
dmode
I filtered by NY and Pittsburgh and found the same ratio of people willing to relocate
vikramkr
It looks like post layoff they've been going above and beyond what's reasonably expected of a company in their position to treat their employees well. Can't imagine they'd have been like this in the kalanik days. Good for them I guess.
ponker
Any idea what the large number of "sales" people in the SF Bay Area do/did for Uber? There isn't an ad business... seems like a marketing-driven customer and driver acquisition program... who is/was Uber directly selling to?
RandomBK
This cURL will fetch the full list (JSON). It doesn't seem they put a limit on the graphql endpoint (as of time of writing).

    curl 'https://www.uber.com/talent/graphql' \
      -H 'authority: www.uber.com' \
      -H 'accept: */*' \
      -H 'x-csrf-token: x' \
      -H 'accept-language: en-US,en;q=0.9' \
      -H 'content-type: application/json' \
      -H 'origin: https://www.uber.com' \
      -H 'sec-fetch-site: same-origin' \
      -H 'sec-fetch-mode: cors' \
      -H 'sec-fetch-dest: empty' \
      -H 'referer: https://www.uber.com/talent/' \
      --data-binary '{"operationName":"getExTalent","variables":{"offset":0,"limit":10000,"seed":1136864353,"params":{}},"query":"query getExTalent($offset: Int, $limit: Int, $seed: Int, $params: GetTalentParamsInput) {\n  getExTalent(offset: $offset, limit: $limit, seed: $seed, params: $params) {\n    seed\n    totalResults {\n      low\n      high\n      unsigned\n      __typename\n    }\n    results {\n      firstName\n      lastName\n      fullName\n      title\n      roleType\n      roleSubTypes\n      summary\n      location {\n        city\n        countryName\n        __typename\n      }\n      relocationWillingness\n      resumeLink\n      linkedInLink\n      otherLink\n      dribbleLink\n      githubLink\n      remoteWillingness\n      email\n      isManager\n      twitterLink\n      portfolioLink\n      isLooking\n      instagramLink\n      sharingID\n      __typename\n    }\n    __typename\n  }\n}\n"}' \
      --compressed
This results in 514 entries.
svntid
wow reads like an orbituary - shame on uber pulling the easy one on those unfortunate folks
vikramkr
If the alternative is the company going out of business, this isn't the "easy one." I don't like uber (I'm sure my post history has plenty of anti-uber mini rants...), and even I'll admit this is pretty nice of them. Most companies going through mass layoffs don't give people severance/benefits as good as uber did (AirBNB also did this well), and I can't say I've heard of one going this far to set up a site to try and get them hired.
mr_coleman
If you want to be extra cynical, think of it as an asset auction listing as part of a liquidation.
rdbell
If the executive team doesn't let staff go they will be fired by the board. If the board doesn't fire the executive team they will be voted out by the shareholders. If the shareholders don't vote out the board the stock price will plummet and in the best case scenario what's left of Uber gets vacuumed up by another company or activist investors and they go back to step 1 minus any of the severance packages and good-will.

It's horribly sad to see mass layoffs but the alternative creates a lot more chaos.

srnvs123
Wow, surprising how nice Uber have been during these layoffs. I'm assuming they either cannot afford anymore negative press given that they look like a failing company to the world, OR they've legitimately transformed themselves from the early days. Id say the former, but I hope the latter