Ask HN: How will more corporate acceptance of remote work play out?
Given that Facebook, Google, Twitter, Shopify, Coinbase, and many more companies are announcing long term plans to allow for vastly more remote positions, what do you think the effects will be to:
* The economy overall?
* High priced localities (SV, SF, NYC, Seattle, etc)?
* Rural economies?
* Engineer pay?
* Workers on visas, H1Bs?
22 comments
[ 3.6 ms ] story [ 84.0 ms ] threadWorkers mental health?
Workers standard of living?
If companies say you'll get a pay cut, it presents an excellent opportunity to poach some talent.
I see a lot of people concerned about wages going down. I suspect wages will go UP for most people as we're no longer trapped working with companies in our cities. There might be some slight downward pressure at big tech as people leave the bay for less expensive locales and are willing to accept less money to work at those companies if they get to stay in, say, Texas or other cheaper locales.
But in my opinion this is the greatest opportunity for workers in history - your options for employment are now unlimited. Companies are going to have to compete a lot harder to get the best talent when they now have to compete with every other company in the world. I've seen some suggest that the opposite would be true - companies can now get employees from anywhere. While true, companies have always had more power to hire from wherever they want - it's always been much harder as an individual to pick up and move your family across the country. You'll probably find it easier to get remote contracting work, too.
I expect this will cause some downward pressure on bigger city property values. Might cause a slight uptick for smaller cities and suburban areas. Rural areas might not have good enough internet yet and are spacious enough that they won't be very affected.
I agree - it will open up a LOT more opportunities for those of us that work remotely. I'm guessing tech salaries will start to 'meet in the middle' regardless of location.
We also shouldn't forget that there is a shortage tech. workers, and more opportunities mean more competition and better offers regardless of location.
I’m really hoping this opens up some doors for her. She’s miserable where she is and has applied to quite a few positions with no bites.
So whatever inherit or natural benefits may come about for workers due to the remote work boom, it's likely these gains will be purposefully offset.
I think there are about 5 tiers.
1. High taxes & many jobs and high salary (SF, NY),
2. None or minimal state/local taxes and semicrowded (Florida?) and medium or lower salary,
3. no taxes but high salary area (Seattle), high expenses,
4. some taxes but medium salary (Portland),
5. less or no taxes and more rural and not much remote work (most of the midwest or south outside big cities), much lower comp today.
There are of course the cartels which need to be dealt with.
Look at places like Florida or Texas without income tax, they are going to be able to draw away workers from states with higher income taxes.
This will create some revenue issues for states that rely on higher income taxes. I believe this will put further pressure on businesses and others that cannot perform work remotely.
My question is still what's the limit on 'claiming to work in <big city> area' when I'm fully remote. If I was working in a vacation house 30 miles away and my company is fully remote, then my tax situation is the same. I'm not moving there, it's my vac home say. Facebook et al need to define what working in the big city means? 50.1% or 183 or 4 days in the city? I know someone who was commuting into Seattle for 1.5 hours each way every other day, working at a seattle company. He's happy working from home now. Would he be working in seattle if he was at facebook?
I want the freedom to live in a cabin in the woods for a month with good internet.