I made a tool to read and write the facts on each public controversy, with liked evidence and in a hierarchy of upvotes and objections.
The aim is to have a place where, in one or two minutes, one can read the main facts on any controversy, instead of having to plough through 10+ hours of material where the factual gems are often hidden. Towards bullshit-free utterance.
The link points to the topic on Coronavirus.
Anyone can add new controversies, add and upvote facts, add objections, and upvote objections. A bit of a Reddit (decentralised hierarchy) / Wikipedia (factual) / Twitter (brevity) cross.
Email login is a bit buggy though works. Google login is faster.
1 comment
[ 0.24 ms ] story [ 10.4 ms ] threadThe aim is to have a place where, in one or two minutes, one can read the main facts on any controversy, instead of having to plough through 10+ hours of material where the factual gems are often hidden. Towards bullshit-free utterance.
The link points to the topic on Coronavirus.
Anyone can add new controversies, add and upvote facts, add objections, and upvote objections. A bit of a Reddit (decentralised hierarchy) / Wikipedia (factual) / Twitter (brevity) cross.
Email login is a bit buggy though works. Google login is faster.
Do you find it helpful?