42 comments

[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 89.0 ms ] thread
Hey everyone! I wanted to share a tool I built a few months ago and have quietly been working on in the background. It's a little rough around the edges, so happy to take feedback, here, or hello@cameronbrown.co.uk.
Not that I'd assume malicious intent on a Hacker News post, but I'll just leave this here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email-address_harvesting
No worries, I think that's a fair risk from a user perspective - upvote for the feedback.

I'd recommend anyone worried about this to sign up with an email alias (<username>+feedsub@gmail.com), (though again, that's something that can still be easily detected).

It's not feedback, it's innuendo and grumped at in 9 different ways in the site guidelines, especially for a legit Show HN post.
For email alias, I'd recommend to use a true email alias solution like 33mail or SimpleLogin as the plus (+) hack doesn't protect the privacy.
Or, to do it yourself, https://github.com/wking/rss2email
The difference between an email client and an RSS reader is that an email client can parse message/rfc822 entries in a feed and an RSS reader has a prominent Mark All As Read button.

I patched Thunderbird for a friend back in 2005 to enable it to show the email UI for message/rfc822 entries in RSS feeds, so that you could receive your email by RSS. We got it working end-to-end with SMTP delivery to the feed, which was pretty cool. It looks like he published a whitepaper about the idea: http://mengwong.com/rssemail/rssemail-006.pdf

Most email clients have a 2-click solution to "mark all as read", which is more than enough in my opinion
Sure, but it speaks directly to why the difference between them is really about mindset and not technologies. For example: If email newsletters were just published as an RSS feed there’d be a lot less need to spend big bucks on deliverability providers. And: If people had a clearly visible button “Mark All As Read” in their email client (with confirmation) there’d be a less uncertainty about using it when underwater.
Indeed, there's a different in mindset between what is and what isn't acceptable to skip. It's too bad it takes work to make the distinction in one's own mailbox between the two categories, but once it's done RSS can be managed the same way email is
(comment deleted)
I use this. It works well. As well not relying another cloud-thing, you can subscribe to "private" feeds (URLs that contain an API key) without giving your key to mentioned cloud-thing.
What's the advantage over ifttt etc.?

Unfortunately, many sites don't provide an rss feed anymore. I have never understood what makes it better to support twitter, fb etc. instead of rss. Somebody will know the answer.

Currently, no specific advantages over IFTTT. But one day I'd like to add other features in future, to grab content that isn't available through feeds (like Instagram), along with custom CSS.
There are some comics I'd like to follow but I'm not interested in creating an Instagram account. If you can add an Instagram feed, I'd be serious in signing up to your service. For most other content, I'm happy enough to run rss2email myself.
I really like the idea, but 2.99 for Pro plan for updating every 15mins and a dark theme? Doesn't sound right. When I see such options(e.g dark theme for paid plan) for those simple tools I always wonder how many open source products people have used to create the product in first place.
Good idea! I am always happy to see more tools come up around the email inbox. Few suggestions -

1. Your privacy page is empty.

2. Instead of asking me to enter a feed URL during signup, you could just start with the email, and then on the next screen, you could show me your list of feed suggestions. I think that would simplify the signup flow.

All the best!

Shameless plug: I run a similar tool called EmailThis [0] that brings bookmarking (similar to Pocket and Instapaper) to your email inbox.

[0] https://www.emailthis.me

Hey - thanks for the link and the suggestions :)
IFTTT is better way
I find IFTTT unreliable, with spotty response to events.
Interestingly, I'm the opposite way: I'd love to get some of my emails in my RSS feed instead. I even wrote a little tool for myself which hackily forwards patreon update emails to my inoreader address so they land in my RSS feed. Cron regularily runs the script (ideally before I see the email)
I'm working on an app that will deliver daily emails of all the stuff that matters to you (rss, calendars, weather, so on..) will need beta testers soon.if you are up for it I'd love to have you test it since you seem to be one of my target users :)
Are you sure? I want things out of my inbox and in my RSS feed instead. I don't want my RSS feed in my emails. Yours seems to be more the latter
Ah, you are right, I misread your comment. Perhaps it's my mind playing tricks on me to think I have real users xD
NewsBlur (a Google Reader replacement) can turn newsletters into RSS feeds with a simple GMail forwarding rule.
I don't really get it, there are LOTS of RSS readers out there, why people still reference a product that doesn't exist since several years?
It was “the” RSS reader. Nostalgia probably.
A long time ago I hacked this together from Aaron’s code:

https://github.com/rcarmo/rss2imap

I’ve been meaning to revisit it for Python 3, maybe make it run serverless (which is a major pain because of the need to access an IMAP server).

And where is the replacement? The main benefit of a feedreader is to have an interface and workflow dedicated for newsfeeds.

Just collecting feed-items is easy, there are several options for this.

If you are a Windows user, Outlook has a built in RSS reader functionality. It's not great, but it does mean you can easily consume feeds on say, a work computer where adding new software is prohibited. It's also private to you, so you are not storing your reading habits on someone else's server.
But now your RSS feeds are on your work computer. Isn’t that worse?
Like others I also used the RSS to email route, because my mail system has everything a RSS reader needs and then more.

It's at this point I realized I spent more time skimming over title and summaries and marking all entries as read than actually reading content that felt interesting. RSS is the ultimate form of information flood and it didn't bring as much value as it should have so I stopped completely and relied on "organic" link aggregators, namely HN and Reddit, because content is triaged by a community whose appeal to news I share.

Maybe I just wasn't subscribed to the correct feeds ? I saw a post a long time ago where RSS is not for feeds with multiple articles in a day or in a week, it's for those very low-volume little websites where authors publish one post per month but you still want to keep track of them. Maybe I should get into that again

I would love to access Twitter as a RSS-style feed because I love the "mark all as read" amnesty feature...
(comment deleted)