8 comments

[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 19.2 ms ] thread
This math doesn't work out. Smaller, cheaper restaurants can't be in the business of "limiting" customers right now. Price has to go up if the quantity is limited. $25 * 30 = only $750/day. After cost of food, that's not worth it. $800 * 20 becomes more worth it.

That being said, lots of higher-end restaurants are already doing this. In SF, they're using "reservations" that are limited to ~30 meals a day (for example: https://www.exploretock.com/benu), and that seems to be working well. But these meals are all ~$100+/person.

Same concept, just don't limit the quantity that much? Perhaps marketing a complete meal rather than a la carte choices would still work for lower-end restaurants. Takes away the decision fatigue / makes it more compatible with impulse buying?

I'm just spitballing here but it seems possible. Would love to hear from anyone with restaurant experience.

I definitely think there's things restaurants can do during a pandemic to stand out. Limit the menu (less work/waste), offer to-go alcohol, team up with other restaurants, offer a free [something] with every meal, etc.

The idea in this article just wouldn't work, though.

Some kind of affordable price point for a lower end restaurant could definitely play into impulse buying. Why not buy a complete meal?
You can view it as a $350 meal discounted to $200. This is all Veblen territory so the target customers are price insensitive.
Good point. Limiting meals for smaller restaurants wouldn't make any sense.
(comment deleted)