This could simply be done as an iterator over a string. Why all the fancy schmancy C++ features?
EDIT: I'm starting to suspect it actually is just an iterator. So why not say that? Instead of mentioning the ranges library, coroutines, generators ...
EDIT: Ok, so ranges make sense. Coroutines still seem overkill to me though.
Ranges are a (start, end) pair of iterators that support begin/end -- think of them like a subset of containers that just provide access to the iterators over them. They also support the end iterator being a different type to the sstart iterator, supporting things like sentinel iterators (e.g. null pointer checks).
The next standard library supports using the standard algorithms with ranges, so you can say things like `std::sort(v)` instead of `std::sort(v.begin(), v.end())`.
IIUC, views are ranges that can adapt the results of the underlying object without changing the contents of that object, such as a lower-case view, or a reversed view. These work by doing the lower-case conversion on dereference, or swapping the increment/decrement operations.
6 comments
[ 0.28 ms ] story [ 23.6 ms ] threadDefinitely gonna do something similar for my own C++ toolkit. :)
EDIT: I'm starting to suspect it actually is just an iterator. So why not say that? Instead of mentioning the ranges library, coroutines, generators ...
EDIT: Ok, so ranges make sense. Coroutines still seem overkill to me though.
The next standard library supports using the standard algorithms with ranges, so you can say things like `std::sort(v)` instead of `std::sort(v.begin(), v.end())`.
IIUC, views are ranges that can adapt the results of the underlying object without changing the contents of that object, such as a lower-case view, or a reversed view. These work by doing the lower-case conversion on dereference, or swapping the increment/decrement operations.
Coroutines are a fantastic way to implement ranges, in particular when you need runtime polymorphism over the way your range is implemented
e.g. they allow you to have for instance :
and then use that like you would use any container-like type, in range-based for-loops, in actual ranges...