Ask HN: How do you feel about TL;DRs on Hacker News?
I've been on Hacker News a very long time. Recently I have noticed that many posts have a "TL;DR" comment giving a brief summary of the linked article.
These TL;DR comments bother me tremendously, but I can't quite articulate why. I feel like maybe it bugs me that someone takes the time to post an interesting article and a comment with nothing more than a summary implies that the article is not worth reading.
I even looked in the guidelines for comments to see if it's discouraged, but didn't find anything.
I realize that communities grow and change over time, so maybe my opinion is uncommon. What do you think?
3 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 16.6 ms ] threadScientific papers have abstracts. Business and government papers have executive summaries. This is not an unusual thing. So I ask: Is it the practice that bothers you, or the label we use to signal it?
What bothers me is when person A posts a link and person B comments with nothing but a summary.