Ask HN: Impossible Ideas?
Hello HN,
Is there any idea that you have that is great, but feel that it is impossible at the present.Or may be an idea that you think that the incumbent or competition is super strong.
I am just looking an idea to hack on weekends after being bored of creating similar apps through out my IT career.
103 comments
[ 4.2 ms ] story [ 172 ms ] threadRuby on Rails and similar for example.
Microsoft Access and similar is a bit older but does that too I guess.
Why we are not abstracting CRUD away like everything else? Is it because engineers are happy creating CRUD apps?
[0]: https://asindu.drileba.capital/2020/02/fighting-of-disease-p...
The answer might involve some sort of web-of-trust solution, and storing proofs on a blockchain, but the hard problems are how to avoid Sybil Attacks and not exposing people's social graphs.
"Urbit OS is a completely new, carefully architected software stack: a VM, programming language, and kernel designed to run software for an individual."
Even solving an impossible problem shouldn't require all of that.
There's nothing impossible from the technical side, but figuring out what is actually useful and time-saving in terms of UX and what would just end up as useless eye candy would require enormous amount of work, I'm afraid.
You look at them once a day, select the ones you want to publish or just click select all, and it publishes them, appropriately spaced out over a 24 hour period.
And use the RTs you get and use them as feedback.
Also, speaking of social networks - giving people the ability to automatically sync their charity contributions to their public social profiles, as in "I'm donating 7% of my income to these causes, and 3% to those" (using some properly designed API from tax authorities) and making it popular enough so that most part of the population is socially nudged to some accepted level of regular charity donations. In my libertarian fantasy, it would gradually replace taxes, but yeah, I'm aware of how idealistic and far-fetched that sounds.
Today Email is effectively federalized, but in practice, unless you have some major spam technology, your inbox will be filled with spam as soon as your email becomes public. Same thing is going to happen with decentralized social netowrks.
Need to clarify re ebook format though - if it's DRMed then any third-party tool is going to be out of luck.
I intended to try it out but never did - might give it a look again soon.
The best i've found is recoll: https://www.lesbonscomptes.com/recoll/
But search quality isn't good.
A real time VR engine. The industry has spent decades building a graphics pipelines for full fidelity and variable frame rate through buffering.
We could go back to something like early consoles that ran at full framerate by displaying a max amount of sprites per frame.
Seems worth experimenting with.
The jeans, not so much (they still need to work on it), but for shirts they were spot on. I will never buy 'off the rack' shirts anymore.
Everyone has different fitting issues. My main one is waist length/width and shoulder width. I'm 6'2" and fit so the waist of most shirts barely go below the top of my jeans and getting the shoulders to fit often means having a parachute around my waist. It looks dumb and clothing fit is extremely important to overall appearance. There's a lot of disruption to be had in this space.
Edit: to be slightly more clear, I'm thinking of technology to replacing the incumbent infrastructure/processes/consumer experience, as opposed to just creating a new specialty brand.
It's baffling to me that Amazon doesn't have something like this. Every vendor of clothing seems to upload a size chart or puts it in the text description, and you wind up with stuff like "6x plus size dress" having a waist size of 32 inches.
I don't understand why someone can't put in a few basic measurements - waist, hip, bust, inseam - and filter clothing based on those, today. It wouldn't be perfect, but it'd be a damned sight better than putting "plus size dress" and getting keyword-stuffed listings made for a size 0.
There are a lot of complex physical jobs people perform that could be automated with enough enginerding and dedication.
Impossible to do with my current resources. Seems like something that will probably happen eventually.
Some scammer made ~80 million bucks selling fake bomb detectors https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-22380368 - I wonder if someone actually made the real deal if it would even be as profitable.
Sadly we see the same devices being used to "detect" covid-19. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/coronav...
Lately, I've had so much time in my life that I've been literally coding out of boredom.
I am a great engineer with 15+ years of experience doing hundreds of different things.
I do not need money. I need to feel, once again, that I have made the impossible, possible.
If you wish to get in touch send me an email to hn @ <username>.com. I leave it here from time to time and a few folks have decided to write back. One day, hopefully, we could be a community of sorts.
Even bigger: Discovering missing parts of the tree.
These are mostly actually impossible right now, but being able to think about things that you want that should be possible and seem completely out of reach is a great technique for finding motivation.
The world is much, much, much bigger and more full than our little brains with our little problems can usually understand. So, some of mine:
1. Live, remote, group music performance. Yeah, latency, blah blah blah. This problem can be solved if you have...
2. Music generation as the standard way music is distributed. Some people love hearing the exact same recorded song played the exact same way over and over again. It bores me. And "live" performances are often musically and sonically inferior. Every musician I know is creative, every note uniquely created and delivered. We should convey that uniqueness in the distribution of the music. Yeah, there are tons of "music that sounds like" projects. Have it be part of the musician's workflow. Get them to trust it.
3. Live noise cancellation for spaces. People love noise cancellation for in ear or over ear headphones, where you have tight control over the sound path and the acoustics. Child's play. Solve it for spaces where you may have undesirable sounds coming from any direction, with unusual acoustics and strange surfaces. A $1000 device that does this makes you $B, because it increases the property value of many spaces by 2 orders of magnitude.
4. Accurate performance reproduction. JFC the state of musical reproduction is so completely absolutely shitty. The chills one experiences being proximate to a virtuoso instrumentalist...even the best tube amp speaker set up does not fool a close listener for more than a few seconds. Is there a Turing-test like name for this? There should be.
5. Instrument/track extraction. We're getting better at this, it's the impossible problem we're closest to solving. But there's still a lot to do.
6. Instrument acquisition. Everyone should be able to acquire skills in an instrument. With all respect to the 10,000 hours theory, we are in the dark ages when it comes to acquisition and skill accumulation. Teaching is terrible and pretty much everybody practices terribly. People learn from watching and doing and participating- we are visual copy paste monkeys. With some combination of robots and visual production and feedback systems and nutrition it should be possible to develop benchmarks for dramatically improved acquisition.
Cheers, great question.
I was thinking about if this being weaponized to suppress speech. If an array could be put on top of a protest to silence it. It's sort of the equivalent of shouting over someone. Would the supreme court find the government pumping out anti-noise a violation of rights?
You might want to know that (4) has been IMO solved (long time audio enthusiast here, spent more than 15 years on solving that exact problem, developed my own startup that was focused on making DACs with the best possible analog sections - I gave up to a better idea done by someone else, which I'm going to mention next.
Rob Watts, a DAC designer from the UK has solved the problem with his FPGA based DACs and pulse array analog sections. Instruments' transients and how they impact a listener (human hearing is far, far more complicated than vision) seems to be the key for the brain to mark a given sound a "natural one" and properly place it into 3D space. Watts works exclusively for Chord Electronics nowadays, but he'd started his own kind of DACs in the 80s. The guy is a genius, I have nothing more to say. My long time quest for properly sounding audio source has been finished. Currently he's working on his Davina project which is going to bring the same technology for audio reproduction (and rebuilding) to studios, leveling up his game even more. Stay tuned, because it's going to take some time. The only other company that does something similar is DCS, but they're extremely expensive and they're rather on the fun side of listening than accuracy.
Myself, I use Chord Electronics Hugo 2 DAC (that's the cheapest one having all important Watts' technology, ca. $2500; there's also Mojo - very cheap, but it's mostly for the on-the-go listening) paired with either Audioquest NightOwl headphones or my valve custom made stereo. It's a bliss.
PS: Regarding (3) there's no way noise cancellation technologies can produce superb audio. Not possible (unfortunately) at this point of technological advancement of how speakers are being build (and close to nothing has changed during the last 60 years in that area), so they should rather be saved for dealing with unpleasantness of very loud environments, not necessarily suited for music listening.
I've got ~250 customer commitments with letters of intent so far but need help with some of the ingestion pipeline work. If you have GIS experience in any capacity (as an analyst, developer, enthusiast, etc.) I'd love to chat.
Do the cameras geo-tag the images into a GEOTIFF or similar at the edge?
What sort of spatial resolution do you get on the resulting maps?
Any chance of multi-spectral imagery in the future? would be amazing for doing remote-sensing projects
Sounds like a awesome project.
What sort of issues are you having with the ingestion pipeline? I have some amount of GIS/mapping experience and happy to weigh in if I can.