To give a different example of what we're dealing with, California Senator Diane Feinstein has been a vocal opponent of encryption. Google "diane feinstein encryption" for some examples; it's a long-running theme with her. At the same time, she was pretty unhappy with the CIA snooping around Senate computers[1]. You'd think she could make the connection that if even her title and the law aren't enough to protect her, maybe encryption can be a good thing, but no, she's one of the senators behind the EARN IT Act.
And Democrats will "reluctantly" vote with both hands for it. Feinstein has been one of the biggest anti-encryption and mass-surveillance champions in the Senate. I don't understand why she's still a senator. She even promised she'd quite in 2018. But I guess the military industrial complex/surveillance special interests brought her back in.
8 comments
[ 5.1 ms ] story [ 42.3 ms ] thread1: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/feins...
2. Read the actual bill for yourself
3. It is not outlawing encryption, stop making up lies.