Ask HN: Why master/slave name change post got removed?
I've noticed the post [1] about a dev leaving OpenSSL after having his (among others) master/slave => parent/child naming change[2] rejected and started reading it. To my surprise, after finishing I noticed the HN post got flagged and removed from the list without any reason.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23737266
[2] https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/2020-July/012677.html
7 comments
[ 4.5 ms ] story [ 25.5 ms ] threadFrom the guidelines [1] :
> Eschew flamebait. Don't introduce flamewar topics unless you have something genuinely new to say. Avoid unrelated controversies and generic tangents.
> Please don't use Hacker News for political or ideological battle. That destroys the curiosity this site exists for.
I don't agree that these posts should be removed, they're not offensive and they don't incite hatred or violence. If people want to get in a flamewar, that's their business. If you don't want to be involved in the discussion, you can just avoid it. This form of moderation doesn't provide people the opportunity to try and deal with controversial discussions in a constructive way, it assumes that this is impossible and that preventing them from arising in the first place is a better solution.
In terms of this post specifically, I think it is quite newsworthy because Rich Salz is a major contributor [2] .
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
[2] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/graphs/contributors
EDIT: formatting
Without any reason? The title was "Goodbye". I just clicked on it, (which I wouldn't've ordinarily, with a nothing title like that) it's a very short message, I had no idea at all what it was about. I'm not at all surprised people flagged it. Why wouldn't they?
An overwhelming majority of stories that are flagged on here are flagged by HN users. No conspiracy theory needed.
For example, "Rich Saltz leaves OpenSSL after rejected master/parent rename proposal".
No conspiracy theory here (might've sounded like one). Both the mail thread and the PR were interesting to read.
If you want it discussed, (which maybe the issue already has been, did you check?) write a blog post on it and submit that, or submit it again as news – not an AskHN – writing a comment explaining what you think is fascinating about it.
The title when I looked a few hours ago was just "Goodbye", hardly clickbait - not sure why anyone would click on it. Not sure what interesting stuff you mean, for me it was a short indecipherable message with no context, links, meaning - nothing about it I wouldn't flag, had I looked.