This article summarizes a large amount of research and analysis.
*Edit: Please cite the particular claims you are flagging this for, so others (including me as a lay reader) can try to address them.
For kevingadd, I think that claim comes from the statement below, drawn from this study [1].
"Scientists are now showing evidence that up to 81% of us can mount a strong response to COVID-19 without ever having been exposed to it before"
[1] https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-35331/v1
"70% of people are likely naturally immune" is an incredibly wild claim I haven't seen anyone make before and it's not even a hyperlink to a source. The article clearly is based on some sources but it's really unclear to me what claims are sourced from where despite the fact that it's making very strong claims.
When I visit a website I make sure to look at the collection of articles that they have published. This gives me an idea of their mission, and how to interpret their content.
5 comments
[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 30.3 ms ] thread*Edit: Please cite the particular claims you are flagging this for, so others (including me as a lay reader) can try to address them.
For kevingadd, I think that claim comes from the statement below, drawn from this study [1]. "Scientists are now showing evidence that up to 81% of us can mount a strong response to COVID-19 without ever having been exposed to it before" [1] https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-35331/v1
For jschwartzi, yes, that claim is theorizing, but so is any other claim on HIT. This study qualifies that figure to an extent[2]. [2] https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.27.20081893v...
In this website, this advice is relevant.