More bogus claims from alarmists. Preindustrial levels are 260-270ppm, so 2.6C-4.1C warming at 530ppm would mean something like 1.6C-3.1C more increase simply from going from 415ppm to 530ppm while from 260-270ppm to 415ppm we warmed approx. 1C. Not remotely plausible and their "science" is apparently averaging 3 carefully selected, uncertain lines while pretending CO2 is the sole cause of warming or all other factors increase simultaneously (despite many past contradicting climate changes).
Why don't we just draw a line from 1940 to today and claim we're warming steadily (we've already "corrected" the peak around 1940)? Obviously, no explanations are needed for this kind of "science".
2 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 18.8 ms ] threadWhy don't we just draw a line from 1940 to today and claim we're warming steadily (we've already "corrected" the peak around 1940)? Obviously, no explanations are needed for this kind of "science".