The Anti-Mask League of 1919: The Cultural Battle of an Enduring Pandemic (untappedcities.com) 12 points by seesawtron 5y ago ↗ HN
[–] behrlich95 5y ago ↗ We think we are some sort of super 21st Century beings, but our cognitive biases remain the same. [–] [dead] tvote2020 5y ago ↗ Or you are just an idiot. Could be that too.
[–] [dead] tvote2020 5y ago ↗ Liberals are destroying the country.It's time for all true patriots to stand up against this scourge.Liberals and their ideology belong in prison. They are literally terrorists spreading their poisonous ideas.
[–] mariodiana 5y ago ↗ Is there evidence that masks did anything to halt the spread of the Spanish flu? [–] kingnothing 5y ago ↗ There is evidence that social distancing helped. I'm not sure about masks specifically. https://qz.com/1816060/a-chart-of-the-1918-spanish-flu-shows... [–] charlieo88 5y ago ↗ Do you have evidence that masks are ineffective in reducing the transmission of influenza? [–] mariodiana 5y ago ↗ In science, as in logic, the onus of proof is on the positive. [–] [dead] charlieo88 5y ago ↗ Your implication being your question is based in logic or scientific curiosity, and not some disingenuous politics. [–] [dead] mariodiana 5y ago ↗ Your ad hominem concedes the argument. [–] zach_garwood 5y ago ↗ Ah yes, the "I am rubber, you are glue" argument.
[–] kingnothing 5y ago ↗ There is evidence that social distancing helped. I'm not sure about masks specifically. https://qz.com/1816060/a-chart-of-the-1918-spanish-flu-shows...
[–] charlieo88 5y ago ↗ Do you have evidence that masks are ineffective in reducing the transmission of influenza? [–] mariodiana 5y ago ↗ In science, as in logic, the onus of proof is on the positive. [–] [dead] charlieo88 5y ago ↗ Your implication being your question is based in logic or scientific curiosity, and not some disingenuous politics. [–] [dead] mariodiana 5y ago ↗ Your ad hominem concedes the argument. [–] zach_garwood 5y ago ↗ Ah yes, the "I am rubber, you are glue" argument.
[–] mariodiana 5y ago ↗ In science, as in logic, the onus of proof is on the positive. [–] [dead] charlieo88 5y ago ↗ Your implication being your question is based in logic or scientific curiosity, and not some disingenuous politics. [–] [dead] mariodiana 5y ago ↗ Your ad hominem concedes the argument. [–] zach_garwood 5y ago ↗ Ah yes, the "I am rubber, you are glue" argument.
[–] [dead] charlieo88 5y ago ↗ Your implication being your question is based in logic or scientific curiosity, and not some disingenuous politics. [–] [dead] mariodiana 5y ago ↗ Your ad hominem concedes the argument. [–] zach_garwood 5y ago ↗ Ah yes, the "I am rubber, you are glue" argument.
[–] [dead] mariodiana 5y ago ↗ Your ad hominem concedes the argument. [–] zach_garwood 5y ago ↗ Ah yes, the "I am rubber, you are glue" argument.
11 comments
[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 41.1 ms ] threadIt's time for all true patriots to stand up against this scourge.
Liberals and their ideology belong in prison. They are literally terrorists spreading their poisonous ideas.