Boeing rebranding 737 Max to 737-8 in press release (boeing.mediaroom.com) 3 points by harha 5y ago ↗ HN
[–] sgillen 5y ago ↗ For anyone wondering, a rebrand has been rumored for some time, and this is the first official press release using a new name. [–] harha 5y ago ↗ The really interesting part is them mixing both names in the statement, as if it were separate models. [–] numpad0 5y ago ↗ Maybe a plane can be 737 MAX or 737-8 depending on the point in time it is observed or upgrades it has gotten or paperworks associated with it? [–] harha 5y ago ↗ My reading is that it’s the same model: “Their order for additional 737-8s“The upgrades are necessary in any case to be certified. [–] numpad0 5y ago ↗ To me they seem carefully worded to match some semantic details than simply mixed up. [–] Someone 5y ago ↗ They’re quoting the customer, who uses “Max”, so they couldn’t fully change it to “8” yet, but wanted to start making the turn.
[–] harha 5y ago ↗ The really interesting part is them mixing both names in the statement, as if it were separate models. [–] numpad0 5y ago ↗ Maybe a plane can be 737 MAX or 737-8 depending on the point in time it is observed or upgrades it has gotten or paperworks associated with it? [–] harha 5y ago ↗ My reading is that it’s the same model: “Their order for additional 737-8s“The upgrades are necessary in any case to be certified. [–] numpad0 5y ago ↗ To me they seem carefully worded to match some semantic details than simply mixed up. [–] Someone 5y ago ↗ They’re quoting the customer, who uses “Max”, so they couldn’t fully change it to “8” yet, but wanted to start making the turn.
[–] numpad0 5y ago ↗ Maybe a plane can be 737 MAX or 737-8 depending on the point in time it is observed or upgrades it has gotten or paperworks associated with it? [–] harha 5y ago ↗ My reading is that it’s the same model: “Their order for additional 737-8s“The upgrades are necessary in any case to be certified. [–] numpad0 5y ago ↗ To me they seem carefully worded to match some semantic details than simply mixed up.
[–] harha 5y ago ↗ My reading is that it’s the same model: “Their order for additional 737-8s“The upgrades are necessary in any case to be certified. [–] numpad0 5y ago ↗ To me they seem carefully worded to match some semantic details than simply mixed up.
[–] numpad0 5y ago ↗ To me they seem carefully worded to match some semantic details than simply mixed up.
[–] Someone 5y ago ↗ They’re quoting the customer, who uses “Max”, so they couldn’t fully change it to “8” yet, but wanted to start making the turn.
6 comments
[ 4.8 ms ] story [ 25.1 ms ] threadThe upgrades are necessary in any case to be certified.