Apparently you must reside in an area of the country that still cares about their upstanding, law abiding citizens, their right to protection from people who have no regard for the law, and where law enforcement is actually allowed and expected to enforce the laws citizens are expected to live by...
Therefore, you are clearly not from the west coast...and you should thank your lucky stars for that.
I have no problem with facial recognition. It is as, if not more, useful as/than an eye witness. Which means to say, use that as a basis for collecting evidence, but not as evidence itself.
For example, if facial recognition linked a looter to John, then have a police officer manually review the security camera and have that police officer file the report. I would hate for John to be arrested due to the "algorithm" and then try to dispute the arrest, only to be told that there is nothing to be done, the "algorithm" has decided.
4 comments
[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 20.8 ms ] threadTherefore, you are clearly not from the west coast...and you should thank your lucky stars for that.
If the term "anarcho-tyrrany" didn't exist I'd have to invent it for this.
For example, if facial recognition linked a looter to John, then have a police officer manually review the security camera and have that police officer file the report. I would hate for John to be arrested due to the "algorithm" and then try to dispute the arrest, only to be told that there is nothing to be done, the "algorithm" has decided.