[–] jolmg 5y ago ↗ I'm here to answer questions if anyone has any.The biggest difference to Haskell's Parsec is probably the automatic labeling and error messages[1]: pry(main)> Parsby::Example::LispParser.sexp.parse "(foo `(foo ,bar) 2.3 . . nil)" Parsby::ExpectationFailed: line 1: (foo `(foo ,bar) 2.3 . . nil) | * failure: char_in("([") | * failure: list | *| failure: symbol | *|| failure: nil | *||| failure: string | *|||| failure: number \\\|| | *| failure: atom | *|| failure: abbrev \\| | * failure: sexp V *| success: lit(".") \-/ *|| success: sexp \---------/ *||| success: sexp \-/ *|||| success: sexp V *||||| success: char_in("([") \\\\\| | * failure: list | * failure: sexp [1] https://github.com/jolmg/parsby#expectationfailed
1 comment
[ 20.1 ms ] story [ 80.4 ms ] threadThe biggest difference to Haskell's Parsec is probably the automatic labeling and error messages[1]:
[1] https://github.com/jolmg/parsby#expectationfailed