Every college student should read this. Maybe if they had read it when I went to school, I would have gotten less harsh looks for showing up to class completely trashed every day...
The hilarious part is that I was able to spend 4 years straight intoxicated, but I ended up getting the exact same degree as the rest of them. But yeah, being wasted and doing as well as my peers sure does suggest I'm pretty dumb, doesn't it.
People who look down on others for drinking are really no different than anybody who looks down on anybody else who has a lifestyle different from their own.
In my well-tested experience, there is a fine line between having fun and making an ass of yourself. The correlation between showing up to class wasted and making an ass of yourself is (again, in my own intimate experience) too large to ignore.
Don't get me wrong, I like to drink a lot. And I don't look down on others who drink a lot. I certainly don't think they're dumb. But I do think promoting/encouraging/bragging about it is generally kind of silly, especially when alcoholism is a serious problem that destroys lives.
In my well-tested experiance, there is a fine line between me being able to sit through a lecture that has been dumbed down to the LCD, and me saying "fuck all" and not seeing to professor again until the final. That fine line is approximately 3-4 drinks ("trashed" is an exageration). On a wet campus it is entirely the professors call, and only once did I receive a complaint (over the bottle, not my behavoir)
Don't get me wrong, I think alcoholism is a problem, but I know that drinking is not. In fact, with all the recent neoprohibitionist MADD crap, I think drinking needs some public advocacy of its own.
Is there any reason this is specific to alcohol? From the article that doesn't appear to be the case. There are heaps of drugs that activate the same parts of the brain mentioned here, without (as many of) the deleterious side effects.
John Markoff's book "What the Dormouse Said" tells the tale of 1960s "acid tests" for the explicit purpose of mind augmentation or enhancement. It's a terribly fascinating read.
Well... alcohol was clearly singled out cause of its legality, and social acceptance. In other words, they worked with the easiest substance to work with.
On my note, I've found alcohol is great for letting you tackle problems once you have a good enough toolbox (that you know how to use). In other words, its kinda trash to learn a new programming language while drunk, but once you know one, it's great for dealing with random/novel situations. I get this especially while going through my school work (particularly physics). Once I have my toolbox of equations and laws to work with, getting buzzed just makes it feel 'easier' to see the solution, and how to put those pieces together.
Somewhat different from the learning a new language example (they are clearly still putting together their toolboxes), but it's also a question of tolerance. Equations and compilers are a lot less tolerant of syntactic (and just in general) mistakes than another human... especially another one at the bar.
Alcohol is an unusual drug because it's ubiquitous (socially and economically acceptable), and it has a very different effect in low doses than in high ones.
My Deleuze reading group imbibes heavily, and it seems (in a totally non-scientific way) to have no ill effects. Then again, it's Deleuze, so it's almost impenetrable anyway. The 1960s in California were full of AI and comp. sci. people doing brain enhancement/augmentation experiments with LSD and other drugs. I see no reason why alcohol can't perform a similar function.
A pet theory of mine is that those with low self-awareness and lowered inhibitions are the fastest learners.
The positive way of saying this is that those who are not afraid of making mistakes will learn the most. By their willingness or indifference to being wrong in a conversation they overcome the problems of accumulating unknown unknowns. Meanwhile others who fear embarrassment accept a higher level of ignorance.
The negative way of saying this is that the loudmouth in class is actually doing everyone a favor.
It ties well into this article, as in the study alcohol is being used as a medium to decrease self-awareness. There could be more to this theory. For instance it possible that alcohol is accelerating the formation of new neural connections. But it wouldn't be needed to show a benefit towards learning.
A similar concept probably applies to the amazing ability of kids to pick up different languages and learn so many new concepts in the early years. Their low self-awareness and disregard for most social norms (including looking stupid ) allows them to be more persistent towards their goal (eg learning a new language or a new skill).
The reason kids pick up languages and concepts early in life is a result of evolution. It has nothing to do with self-awareness and disregard with social norms. It's the complete opposite. Survival of early humans depended on learning and communication. When we were hunter/gatherers cooperation and socialization meant survival. The faster you learned language and social skills (i.e. hunting or gathering) meant an increased chance of survival. The faster you learned, the more likely you were to survive. Language and socialization were key to early human survival and the more you excelled at it, the more you thrived. If you didn't, your more likely to be a victim of natural selection. Humans have an intrinsic nature to conform to what they perceive as "social norms". It's a genetic response.
I don't see how the two (excelling at language acquisition due to lowered social inhibition vs evolving to excel at language acquisition early in life) are mutually exclusive.
This doesn't contradict the previous post. Evolution may have resulted in a mix of adaptive neural physiology and the lack of self-awareness. But perhaps the latter is tempered as a result of the acquisition of language.
Its fun how you see your own strategies somewhat validated :). I started to improve my french by watching french movies and drinking one beer before and one while watching the movie. My experience is that I tend not to care about understanding one word while focusing more on whole dialogues. So I attribute that more to a healthy focus shift than a self-awareness issue.
Also, it makes the process more enjoyable, for me. I might want to add that I do not drink at all for long stretches (weeks) while still enjoying a good wine or beer, so this is also a real reward. This, in my opinion, is also key. It kind of lured me into actually doing what I intended.
Well, there's some evidence that one's general level of anxiety correlates strongly to their success at mathematics. I can't seem to find the paper though, as it's been drowned out by tons of "Math Anxiety" material.
I'm reminded of an interesting way babylonian merchants used to do business. They would bargain for a deal while intoxicated on alcohol, thus proving to each other that they are being honest.
Perhaps we should force all politicians to do the same thing? :)
28 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 119 ms ] threadPeople who look down on others for drinking are really no different than anybody who looks down on anybody else who has a lifestyle different from their own.
Don't get me wrong, I like to drink a lot. And I don't look down on others who drink a lot. I certainly don't think they're dumb. But I do think promoting/encouraging/bragging about it is generally kind of silly, especially when alcoholism is a serious problem that destroys lives.
Don't get me wrong, I think alcoholism is a problem, but I know that drinking is not. In fact, with all the recent neoprohibitionist MADD crap, I think drinking needs some public advocacy of its own.
Curious that alcohol was singled out.
On my note, I've found alcohol is great for letting you tackle problems once you have a good enough toolbox (that you know how to use). In other words, its kinda trash to learn a new programming language while drunk, but once you know one, it's great for dealing with random/novel situations. I get this especially while going through my school work (particularly physics). Once I have my toolbox of equations and laws to work with, getting buzzed just makes it feel 'easier' to see the solution, and how to put those pieces together.
Somewhat different from the learning a new language example (they are clearly still putting together their toolboxes), but it's also a question of tolerance. Equations and compilers are a lot less tolerant of syntactic (and just in general) mistakes than another human... especially another one at the bar.
The positive way of saying this is that those who are not afraid of making mistakes will learn the most. By their willingness or indifference to being wrong in a conversation they overcome the problems of accumulating unknown unknowns. Meanwhile others who fear embarrassment accept a higher level of ignorance.
The negative way of saying this is that the loudmouth in class is actually doing everyone a favor.
It ties well into this article, as in the study alcohol is being used as a medium to decrease self-awareness. There could be more to this theory. For instance it possible that alcohol is accelerating the formation of new neural connections. But it wouldn't be needed to show a benefit towards learning.
Also, it makes the process more enjoyable, for me. I might want to add that I do not drink at all for long stretches (weeks) while still enjoying a good wine or beer, so this is also a real reward. This, in my opinion, is also key. It kind of lured me into actually doing what I intended.
Study drunk, test better when drunk (lets say buzzed, most people "drunk" cannot function, its subjective in terminology).
Study sober, test better when sober.
You cannot mix it (in the study), IE: study drunk, test sober, study sober, test drunk.
Its a "duh" or common sense thing to me, brain functions being formulative to your current state of function.
I BELIEVE it was the University of Utah (which has a myriad of awesome drunk studies (cell phones vs >.08 alcohol levels, etc).
2. Topic of discussion at every college party ever
No one's mentioned the Ballmer Peak yet?
http://xkcd.com/323/
Perhaps we should force all politicians to do the same thing? :)