7 comments

[ 1.7 ms ] story [ 35.0 ms ] thread
Appears that he works for Apple now.
If I remember correctly, as part of Apple's employment contract, employees are restricted from contributing code to open source projects.
This is not uncommon for bigcorps. Could be many reasons for this, including licensing, competition, or fear of data leakage.

Bit surprising for this to come from Google though.

This would make sense for larger infrastructural projects. But for a single feature extension to a command line shell?
Anyone can claim to work for Google in any of the Social sites.

Also, nobody but small potatoes use the term 'employer'. They usually use the term company/firm