Social media is trying to limit the dissemination of this story. No one knows if it is true or not, but a legitimate news source is confident in it & its sourcing is more transparent than many other stories we are bombarded with. I thought I would make it easier for people to find so that the wise people here can try to judge for themselves.
(1) details in this new hoax mail are the same as in previous Russian Hunter disinformation. They were investigated and found not to be true. 1) FBI found it false, 2) The Republican Senate Report on Hunter Biden found the story false, 3) DOJ investigation started by Bill Barr just find the story false.
(2) All details over this laptop story left out by NY Post story are ridiculously absurd.
People who take this seriously don't do even cursory followups for the news they find interesting. Everything that is posted on a news site comes out of blue as totally new thing. This story has history. This "new evidence" was found to be false previously.
We don't know one way or another. Just because you don't like the Senate report doesn't mean it is untrue. The FBI did not find it false; it has not commented.
How do you explain the pictures. Are they deep fakes?
in my case, this upvote is not an endorsement of the story (because it needs to be investigated given the timing), but a rebuke of the selective silencing of stories released by, and deplatforming of, recognized news organizations that don’t support the candidates the tech platforms prefer.
7 comments
[ 968 ms ] story [ 2679 ms ] threadWe know it's not true because:
(1) details in this new hoax mail are the same as in previous Russian Hunter disinformation. They were investigated and found not to be true. 1) FBI found it false, 2) The Republican Senate Report on Hunter Biden found the story false, 3) DOJ investigation started by Bill Barr just find the story false.
(2) All details over this laptop story left out by NY Post story are ridiculously absurd.
People who take this seriously don't do even cursory followups for the news they find interesting. Everything that is posted on a news site comes out of blue as totally new thing. This story has history. This "new evidence" was found to be false previously.
How do you explain the pictures. Are they deep fakes?