If you like, or hate, something, anything you can find 10 people on Twitter to highlight and make it look like the world hates/loves it. It's a cheap trick
There is a lot of justification for their choice of colors, fonts, and symbols. I wonder how much of that is after-the-fact excuses for why a focus group liked the design, versus motivating principles that guided the design choices in the first place.
This is a terrible logo by any objective visual design standards -- the shape, proportion, weight are all decidedly unappealing. Honestly, three simple circles would have been better. As for the "3D ellipsis" concept -- I think this is a classic example of a Gestalt psychological phenomenon, where knowing the concept in advance informs the holistic visual interpretation. I have to wonder if they bothered to focus test the logo on individuals who were not privy to the concept before their initial impression, because this reads like a circle followed by two 2D squashed ovals, with no obvious indication of three-dimensionality.
5 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 21.3 ms ] threadIf you like, or hate, something, anything you can find 10 people on Twitter to highlight and make it look like the world hates/loves it. It's a cheap trick
Seems like logos that need a long explanation are usually bad logos.