Ask HN: How do you read RSS feeds?
How do you read RSS feeds?
How many feeds are you subscribed to? How do you read them: Skim all posts? Read selectively? Read everything? Why do you read feeds the way you do? If you don't, why do you choose not to?
43 comments
[ 1.9 ms ] story [ 101 ms ] threadPerhaps I need to adjust my approach to feeds to maximize my information/time; I tend to cycle between subscribing to many feeds and then unsubscribing from many. My biggest trouble is with feeds that are high volume (1 post/day or more) yet have interesting content. These can be enormous timesinks if I'm not careful.
Really want to change that, so there's no fixed "inbox", but the posts that are critical should bubble up to top, and the rest should only be findable with specific topic searches.
These I see all day, skim almost all (especially in the morning) and hit quite a few. Keeping it confined to my little dashboard area makes it accessible, while keeping it ignorable/attendable the same way I manage email et al.
I also use mobile Google Reader on my BlackBerry when bored.
I also track around 800 feeds (opinion / lower frequency) on Netvibes on a weekly / biweekly basis.
The stuff I was interested in would change over time, so I was left with feeds I wasn't so interested in anymore. I tried different feedreaders. And I would always feel overwhelmed when I saw 4,283 unread messages.
So I'm back trying it again with a "must read" folder in Google Reader and only putting feeds in that I definitely want to read.
But when I do subscribe and am committed to reading, I try to make an effort to at least open every post and start reading it.
Anyway, I use Google Reader. I tend to read everything I subscribe to. If I don't read it, I unsubscribe to it after I've ignored it long enough. I have maybe 30-40 subscriptions, all to sites that post infrequently, so I rarely have more than a handful of articles unread.
I get a lot of interesting articles via Hacker News too, and also via Google-Reader recommendations (one of GReader's killer features imho).
Seriously, I'm subscribed to about 40 feeds, but I usually don't even start my feed browser because it's a time sink.
The S/N ratio with most blogs isn't very high, but I subscribe just to get that occasional important nugget of information/insight.
But I am coming to the realization that RSS is a bit of a distraction - if I start my RSS reader, I feel obliged to read everything just to get rid of the 'unread' icon. It doesn't really help me build great stuff.
I would re-subscribe to the HN feed if there were some option for a feed which only displays entries with X upvotes and/or X comments (and X could be specified in the options).
The general problem with subscribing to the feed is that I don't see which entries are popular and which not because stories tend to hit the frontpage rather fast on HN compared to other big sites.
For now, I just visit HN and click on a few stories on the frontpage (mostly these with many comments or upvotes).
Including a rating, or including a dynamic feed for a particular rating would be icing on the cake.
fwiw, i'm a happy google reader user -- 158 subscriptions. The only downside is that it's my go-to procrastination website. I read just about all RSS content, and click through about 10-20% of the time depending on the feed. If I find that I clear the unread on a feed more than once or twice, I'll usually unsubscribe (because obviously I don't have the time to keep up with it). Sometimes I use feeds as a glorified bookmark.
Yet at work, I use my E-mail (Thunderbird), perhaps because the RSS feeds tend to be blogs, newsgroups or other similar E-mail-like items.
In other words, my reader depends on the style of the content: is it E-mail-like, or web-like.
I have my feeds logically grouped into prioritized groups so that if I start to get a backlog of 500+ posts I will read my favorite blog from a given category then mark all as read to reduce the counts.
a) took too much absolute time (high volume, long posts - ie big news sites without targeted content)
b) too low signal to noise ratio (typically from someone that writes one popular posts that's a little outside their main topics) - Stuff White People like was on this - funny, not that funny, repetitive, too often. If it was once a week, I would have read it.
I read (see) probably 50 posts a day - anything more than that and I go back and prune some. I spend maybe 1-2 hours a day reading. It's my equivalent of watching TV. Here are the main categories:
Must reads - the Yegges, Grahams, Mosers, etc
High volume, quick reads - FAIL blog, Seth Godin
High volume, useful but not always great - SvN, CodingHorror, Joel
Low volume - product blogs, occasional bloggers
129.
Read the most important ones, then eventually catch up on the other ones.
I'd go mad if I didn't read them selectively like this.
Quite a pain on Monday (I don't read feeds on weekends) to come into work and have 50 new articles on Business of Software and Hacker News :P. Just one of those burdens I bear, I guess. I used to actually click through and read each and every HackerNews article, so I've improved somewhat from there. Little baby steps.
Every month or so I go through my feeds and only keep the ones that consistently have posts that catch my attention.
Otherwise, I check HN and a couple other news sites. Most of the good stuff tends to rise to the top, and Google Alerts catches the good articles that don't get on the front page.